Hering Rudolf, Peters Doris, Zinserling Jörg, Wrigge Hermann, von Spiegel Tilman, Putensen Christian
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Oct;28(10):1426-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1442-z. Epub 2002 Aug 22.
Controlled mechanical ventilation can impair systemic and renal blood flow and function, which may be aggravated by respiratory acidosis. We hypothesized that partial ventilatory support using airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) with spontaneous breathing provides better cardiopulmonary and renal function than full ventilatory support using APRV without spontaneous breathing.
Prospective randomized study.
Intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Twelve patients with acute lung injury (ALI).
Airway pressure release ventilation with and without spontaneous breathing, maintaining either the same minute ventilation (V(E)) or the same airway pressure (Paw) limits.
Systemic hemodynamics were estimated by double-indicator dilution, effective renal blood flow (ERBF) by para-aminohippurate, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by inulin clearance.
Compared to APRV with spontaneous breathing, cardiac index (CI) was decreased when the upper Paw limit was increased to provide the same V(E) (4.26+/-1.21 l min(-1) m(-2)vs 3.72+/-0.99 l min(-1) m(-2); p<0.05) while CI was increased when Paw limits were held constant (4.91+/-1.41 l min(-1) m(-2); p<0.05). Effective renal blood flow and GFR were higher during APRV with spontaneous breathing (858+/-388 ml min(-1) m(-2) and 94+/-47 ml min(-1) m(-2)) than during APRV without spontaneous breathing and the same V(E) (714+/-236 ml min(-1) m(-2)and 82+/-35 ml min(-1) m(-2)) or the same Paw (675+/-287 ml min(-1) m(-2) and 80+/-41 ml min(-1) m(-2); p<0.05). Urine volume did not change.
Spontaneous breathing during APRV was associated with better renal perfusion and function than APRV without spontaneous breathing applying either the same V(E) or the same Paw limits. Maintaining spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support may, therefore, be advantageous in preventing deterioration of renal function in patients with ALI.
控制性机械通气可损害全身及肾脏血流和功能,呼吸性酸中毒可能会使其加重。我们假设,与使用无自主呼吸的气道压力释放通气(APRV)进行完全通气支持相比,使用有自主呼吸的APRV进行部分通气支持能提供更好的心肺和肾脏功能。
前瞻性随机研究。
一所大学医院的重症监护病房。
12例急性肺损伤(ALI)患者。
有自主呼吸和无自主呼吸的气道压力释放通气,维持相同的分钟通气量(V(E))或相同的气道压力(Paw)限制。
通过双指示剂稀释法评估全身血流动力学,通过对氨基马尿酸评估有效肾血流量(ERBF),通过菊粉清除率评估肾小球滤过率(GFR)。
与有自主呼吸的APRV相比,当提高Paw上限以提供相同的V(E)时,心脏指数(CI)降低(4.26±1.21升·分钟-1·米-2对3.72±0.99升·分钟-1·米-2;p<0.05),而当Paw限制保持恒定时CI升高(4.91±1.41升·分钟-1·米-2;p<0.05)。有自主呼吸的APRV期间的有效肾血流量和GFR高于无自主呼吸且V(E)相同的APRV期间(858±388毫升·分钟-1·米-2和94±47毫升·分钟-1·米-2),也高于无自主呼吸且Paw相同的APRV期间(714±236毫升·分钟-1·米-2和82±35毫升·分钟-1·米-2)或相同Paw时(675±287毫升·分钟-1·米-2和80±41毫升·分钟-1·米-2;p<0.05)。尿量未发生变化。
与在相同V(E)或相同Paw限制下无自主呼吸的APRV相比,APRV期间的自主呼吸与更好的肾脏灌注和功能相关。因此,在通气支持期间维持自主呼吸可能有利于预防ALI患者肾功能恶化。