• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共和私有森林的便利设施价值:审视价值与态度的关系。

Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship.

作者信息

Tarrant Mihael A, Cordell H Ken

机构信息

1-309 Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2152, USA.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2002 Nov;30(5):692-703. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7
PMID:12375089
Abstract

Public values toward forests have changed since the late 1980s, from a commodity-oriented perspective toward a more inclusive (commodity and non-commodity) orientation. This study examines the influence of four indicators of population diversity (age, ethnic background, place of residence, and gender) on amenity values of forests, environmental attitudes, and forest value-attitude correspondence. Four values of public and private forests were assessed, wood production (utilitarian value), clean air (a life support value), scenic beauty (an aesthetic value), and heritage (a spiritual value). Environmental attitudes were measured using a modified version of the New Environmental Paradigm scale. Five hundred and forty-eight randomly selected residents of households in 13 states of the Southern United States participated in a telephone interview. Age and ethnic background were found to moderate the value-attitude relationship, with the strength of the association being dependent upon the type of forest (i.e., public or private) and the forest value (i.e., utilitarian, life support, spiritual, and aesthetic). Females, younger persons (less than 43 years old), and whites reported lower utilitarian values of forests than their respective counterparts. Results are interpreted within the context of an emerging post-material society, in which a biocentric orientation to forests and the natural environment may be favored more by a younger (versus older) generation and increasingly racially diverse U.S. population. Implications for managing forests using a multiple-values (versus multiple-uses) approach are discussed.

摘要

自20世纪80年代末以来,公众对森林的价值观发生了变化,从以商品为导向的视角转向了更具包容性(商品和非商品)的取向。本研究考察了人口多样性的四个指标(年龄、种族背景、居住地和性别)对森林的舒适价值、环境态度以及森林价值-态度对应关系的影响。评估了公有林和私有林的四种价值,即木材生产(功利价值)、清洁空气(生命支持价值)、风景美(审美价值)和遗产(精神价值)。使用新环境范式量表的修改版来衡量环境态度。在美国南部13个州随机选取548户居民进行电话访谈。研究发现,年龄和种族背景会调节价值-态度关系,这种关联的强度取决于森林类型(即公有林或私有林)和森林价值(即功利、生命支持、精神和审美)。女性、年轻人(43岁以下)和白人报告的森林功利价值低于各自的对应群体。研究结果在新兴的后物质社会背景下进行了解读,在后物质社会中,年轻一代(相对于年长一代)以及种族日益多样化的美国人口可能更倾向于对森林和自然环境采取以生物为中心的取向。讨论了采用多价值(而非多用途)方法管理森林的意义。

相似文献

1
Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship.公共和私有森林的便利设施价值:审视价值与态度的关系。
Environ Manage. 2002 Nov;30(5):692-703. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7.
2
In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: the effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood.美国太平洋西北地区可变保留采伐林分和成熟林分的林内景观美:断面积、密度、保留模式和倒木的影响
J Environ Manage. 2009 Oct;91(1):245-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
3
Forest value orientations in Australia: an application of computer content analysis.澳大利亚的森林价值取向:计算机内容分析的应用
Environ Manage. 2008 Jan;41(1):52-63. doi: 10.1007/s00267-007-9011-4. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
4
Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India.发展倡议会影响当地对保护的态度吗?来自印度卡拉克德-蒙丹图赖老虎保护区的案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2006 Apr;79(2):188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.007. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
5
Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland.芬兰城市森林效益的经济评估。
J Environ Manage. 2001 May;62(1):75-92. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0421.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Public perceptions of risk to forest biodiversity.公众对森林生物多样性风险的认知。
Risk Anal. 2005 Jun;25(3):543-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00623.x.
8
Forest cover change, physiography, local economy, and institutions in a mountain watershed in Nepal.尼泊尔一个山区流域的森林覆盖变化、地貌、地方经济与机构
Environ Manage. 2004 Jan;33(1):48-61. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0031-4. Epub 2004 Jan 8.
9
The role of population projections in environmental management.人口预测在环境管理中的作用。
Environ Manage. 2002 Jul;30(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0068-1.
10
Quantitative assessment of people-oriented forestry in Bangladesh: a case study in the Tangail forest division.孟加拉国以人为本的林业定量评估:以唐盖尔森林分区为例
J Environ Manage. 2008 Jul;88(1):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.029. Epub 2007 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmentally sustainable: How are the practices in the organic food tourist route?环境可持续性:有机食品旅游路线中的实践情况如何?
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 27;9(7):e17546. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17546. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia.谁在乎森林,为何在乎?亚马孙地区后边疆地带森林的个人价值
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 12;11(12):e0167691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167691. eCollection 2016.
3
Urban Bird Feeding: Connecting People with Nature.
城市鸟类喂养:让人与大自然相连。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 18;11(7):e0158717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158717. eCollection 2016.
4
The right tree for the job? perceptions of species suitability for the provision of ecosystem services.适合这项工作的树?对物种提供生态系统服务适宜性的认知。
Environ Manage. 2014 Apr;53(4):783-99. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0239-5. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
5
Perception of forest values in the alpine community of trentino region (Italy).阿尔卑斯山社区对森林价值的认知。特伦蒂诺地区(意大利)。
Environ Manage. 2013 Feb;51(2):414-22. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9974-7. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
6
Capturing old-growth values for use in forest decision-making.获取老龄林价值以用于森林决策。
Environ Manage. 2009 Feb;43(2):237-48. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9133-3. Epub 2008 May 8.
7
Environmental policy beliefs of stakeholders in protected area management.保护区管理中利益相关者的环境政策信念
Environ Manage. 2007 Apr;39(4):515-25. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0053-9. Epub 2007 Jan 29.
8
What makes them pay? Values of volunteer tourists working for sea turtle conservation.是什么让他们愿意付出?从事海龟保护工作的志愿游客的价值观。
Environ Manage. 2006 Jul;38(1):84-98. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0188-0.
9
Value orientation and forest management: the forest health debate.价值取向与森林管理:森林健康辩论
Environ Manage. 2005 Oct;36(4):495-505. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-7256-8.