Arjunan M, Holmes Christopher, Puyravaud Jean-Philippe, Davidar Priya
Salim Ali School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry 605 014, India.
J Environ Manage. 2006 Apr;79(2):188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.007. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
We evaluated the conservation attitudes of the local villagers living adjacent to the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve in southern India 6 years after implementation of a World Bank funded eco-development project. We assessed attitudes towards three facets of conservation: the tiger, an emblematic species signifying India's commitment to wildlife conservation; the forest, a principle source of fuel-wood and other products; and the Forest Department, which manages the forest. More specifically we predicted that (i) attitudes would be an effective predictor of resource use interest in the forest and (ii) benefits obtained from the EDP would create more favorable attitudes towards conservation and the protected area employees. Twelve villages located within 3 km from the reserve boundary were chosen and 2-3% of the households interviewed with regard to their attitudes towards these three facets of conservation, their household resource use patterns, wealth, sex, age and length of residency. We found significant associations between wealth, sex, age and both tiger and forest conservation. Providing benefits has not changed the underlying attitudes of the communities. The poorer sections of society, whether receiving benefits or not, tended to support tiger conservation because conserving wildlife did not affect their livelihood in any way, whereas both the rich and poor had misgivings about forest conservation due to dependency on forest products. We conclude that the eco-development project has not effectively addressed the most important of the local concerns.
在一个由世界银行资助的生态发展项目实施6年后,我们评估了印度南部与卡拉卡德-蒙丹图赖老虎保护区相邻居住的当地村民的保护态度。我们评估了对保护三个方面的态度:老虎,这一象征物种代表着印度对野生动物保护的承诺;森林,薪材和其他产品的主要来源;以及管理森林的森林部门。更具体地说,我们预测:(i)态度将是对森林资源利用兴趣的有效预测指标;(ii)从生态发展项目中获得的利益将对保护和保护区工作人员产生更有利的态度。我们选择了距离保护区边界3公里内的12个村庄,并就他们对保护的这三个方面的态度、家庭资源使用模式、财富、性别、年龄和居住时间,对2 - 3%的家庭进行了访谈。我们发现财富、性别、年龄与老虎和森林保护之间存在显著关联。提供利益并没有改变社区的基本态度。社会较贫困阶层,无论是否获得利益,往往支持老虎保护,因为保护野生动物对他们的生计没有任何影响,而富人和穷人由于依赖森林产品,对森林保护都有所疑虑。我们得出结论,生态发展项目没有有效解决当地最重要的关切问题。