King Irena B, Satia-Abouta Jessie, Thornquist Mark D, Bigler Jeannette, Patterson Ruth E, Kristal Alan R, Shattuck Ann L, Potter John D, White Emily
Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, 98109-1024, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Oct;11(10 Pt 1):1130-3.
There is considerable interest in noninvasive and cost-effective methods for obtaining DNA in large-scale studies. In this randomized crossover study of 22 participants, we compared the DNA yield, quality, and associated costs of buccal cell DNA collected using cytobrushes (three brushes per collection) and swish (i.e., mouthwash) in self-administered procedures. There was a nonstatistically significant higher yield from the mouthwash compared with cytobrush collections (15.8 microg versus 12.0 microg, respectively; P = 0.53). PCR reactions that required short (0.3 kb) or intermediate (1.1 kb) DNA fragments were 100% successful for DNA from brush and mouthwash, whereas PCRs for reactions that required long fragments (7.8 kb) failed for all of the participants from cytobrush DNA and were 81% successful for DNA from the mouthwash source. The brush collections provided sufficient DNA for an estimated 150-225 PCR reactions requiring short and intermediate DNA fragments. The estimated per person costs for buccal brush DNA collections in large studies were less then half (8.50 dollars) those for the mouthwash method (18 dollars). In addition, we tested whether cytobrush instructions to rub cheeks before collection or collect cells only in the morning increased DNA yield and whether repeat brushings of the same cheek reduced DNA yield. These variations resulted in no significant differences in DNA yields. We conclude that the collection of DNA with cytobrushes using simple instructions is cost effective in large-scale studies, and yields sufficient quantity and quality of DNA for genotyping.
在大规模研究中,人们对获取DNA的非侵入性且经济高效的方法有着浓厚兴趣。在这项针对22名参与者的随机交叉研究中,我们比较了在自我操作程序中使用细胞刷(每次采集三把刷子)和漱口水(即漱口)收集颊细胞DNA的产量、质量及相关成本。与细胞刷采集相比,漱口水采集的产量略高但无统计学意义(分别为15.8微克和12.0微克;P = 0.53)。对于需要短(0.3 kb)或中等长度(1.1 kb)DNA片段的PCR反应,来自刷子和漱口水的DNA成功率均为100%,而对于需要长片段(7.8 kb)的PCR反应,所有来自细胞刷DNA的参与者均失败,来自漱口水来源的DNA成功率为81%。细胞刷采集提供的DNA足以进行估计150 - 225次需要短和中等长度DNA片段的PCR反应。在大型研究中,颊刷DNA采集的人均估计成本不到漱口水方法(18美元)的一半(8.50美元)。此外,我们测试了在采集前用细胞刷摩擦脸颊或仅在早晨采集细胞是否会提高DNA产量,以及对同一脸颊重复刷洗是否会降低DNA产量。这些变化导致DNA产量无显著差异。我们得出结论,在大规模研究中,按照简单说明使用细胞刷收集DNA具有成本效益,并且能产生足够数量和质量的DNA用于基因分型。