• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颊细胞DNA产量、质量及采集成本:大规模研究方法的比较

Buccal cell DNA yield, quality, and collection costs: comparison of methods for large-scale studies.

作者信息

King Irena B, Satia-Abouta Jessie, Thornquist Mark D, Bigler Jeannette, Patterson Ruth E, Kristal Alan R, Shattuck Ann L, Potter John D, White Emily

机构信息

Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, 98109-1024, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Oct;11(10 Pt 1):1130-3.

PMID:12376522
Abstract

There is considerable interest in noninvasive and cost-effective methods for obtaining DNA in large-scale studies. In this randomized crossover study of 22 participants, we compared the DNA yield, quality, and associated costs of buccal cell DNA collected using cytobrushes (three brushes per collection) and swish (i.e., mouthwash) in self-administered procedures. There was a nonstatistically significant higher yield from the mouthwash compared with cytobrush collections (15.8 microg versus 12.0 microg, respectively; P = 0.53). PCR reactions that required short (0.3 kb) or intermediate (1.1 kb) DNA fragments were 100% successful for DNA from brush and mouthwash, whereas PCRs for reactions that required long fragments (7.8 kb) failed for all of the participants from cytobrush DNA and were 81% successful for DNA from the mouthwash source. The brush collections provided sufficient DNA for an estimated 150-225 PCR reactions requiring short and intermediate DNA fragments. The estimated per person costs for buccal brush DNA collections in large studies were less then half (8.50 dollars) those for the mouthwash method (18 dollars). In addition, we tested whether cytobrush instructions to rub cheeks before collection or collect cells only in the morning increased DNA yield and whether repeat brushings of the same cheek reduced DNA yield. These variations resulted in no significant differences in DNA yields. We conclude that the collection of DNA with cytobrushes using simple instructions is cost effective in large-scale studies, and yields sufficient quantity and quality of DNA for genotyping.

摘要

在大规模研究中,人们对获取DNA的非侵入性且经济高效的方法有着浓厚兴趣。在这项针对22名参与者的随机交叉研究中,我们比较了在自我操作程序中使用细胞刷(每次采集三把刷子)和漱口水(即漱口)收集颊细胞DNA的产量、质量及相关成本。与细胞刷采集相比,漱口水采集的产量略高但无统计学意义(分别为15.8微克和12.0微克;P = 0.53)。对于需要短(0.3 kb)或中等长度(1.1 kb)DNA片段的PCR反应,来自刷子和漱口水的DNA成功率均为100%,而对于需要长片段(7.8 kb)的PCR反应,所有来自细胞刷DNA的参与者均失败,来自漱口水来源的DNA成功率为81%。细胞刷采集提供的DNA足以进行估计150 - 225次需要短和中等长度DNA片段的PCR反应。在大型研究中,颊刷DNA采集的人均估计成本不到漱口水方法(18美元)的一半(8.50美元)。此外,我们测试了在采集前用细胞刷摩擦脸颊或仅在早晨采集细胞是否会提高DNA产量,以及对同一脸颊重复刷洗是否会降低DNA产量。这些变化导致DNA产量无显著差异。我们得出结论,在大规模研究中,按照简单说明使用细胞刷收集DNA具有成本效益,并且能产生足够数量和质量的DNA用于基因分型。

相似文献

1
Buccal cell DNA yield, quality, and collection costs: comparison of methods for large-scale studies.颊细胞DNA产量、质量及采集成本:大规模研究方法的比较
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Oct;11(10 Pt 1):1130-3.
2
Determinants of DNA yield and quality from buccal cell samples collected with mouthwash.用漱口水收集的颊细胞样本的DNA产量和质量的决定因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Sep;10(9):1005-8.
3
Optimizing buccal cell DNA yields in mothers and infants for human leukocyte antigen genotyping.优化母婴口腔细胞DNA产量以进行人类白细胞抗原基因分型。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Jul 1;160(1):77-84. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh171.
4
Collection of human genomic DNA from buccal cells for genetics studies: comparison between cytobrush, mouthwash, and treated card.用于遗传学研究的从颊细胞中收集人类基因组DNA:细胞刷、漱口水和处理过的卡片之间的比较
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2005;2005(3):291-6. doi: 10.1155/JBB.2005.291.
5
A simple mouthwash method for obtaining genomic DNA in molecular epidemiological studies.一种在分子流行病学研究中获取基因组DNA的简单漱口水方法。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998 Aug;7(8):719-24.
6
Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study.队列研究中通过邮寄方式收集颊细胞DNA的可行性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Jun;10(6):701-3.
7
Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash.在流行病学研究中,通过口腔细胞刷和漱口水从成年人中收集基因组DNA。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Jun;10(6):687-96.
8
Buccal DNA collection: comparison of buccal swabs with FTA cards.口腔DNA采集:口腔拭子与FTA卡的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Apr;15(4):816-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0753.
9
Cost-effective analysis of genotyping using oral cells in the geriatric population.老年人群中使用口腔细胞进行基因分型的成本效益分析。
Genet Mol Res. 2010 Sep 21;9(3):1886-95. doi: 10.4238/vol9-3gmr939.
10
[Feasibility of genetic polymorphisms analysis using genomic DNA obtained from human buccal cells].[利用从人类颊细胞获取的基因组DNA进行基因多态性分析的可行性]
Ai Zheng. 2005 Jul;24(7):893-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Modified Method for DNA Extraction From Buccal Cells for Genetic Epidemiological Studies Among Children.一种用于儿童遗传流行病学研究的从颊细胞中提取DNA的改良方法。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 21;16(12):e76140. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76140. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
β2-microglobulin is overexpressed in buccal cells of elderly and correlated with expression of p16 and inflammatory genes.β2微球蛋白在老年人的颊细胞中过度表达,且与p16和炎症基因的表达相关。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 Oct;29(10):103418. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103418. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
3
Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self-collection of buccal cells for RNA yield.
优化研究者采集和自我采集颊细胞以提高RNA产量的临床试验。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan 18;6(1):116-121. doi: 10.1002/lio2.516. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
How to Transition from Single-Gene Pharmacogenetic Testing to Preemptive Panel-Based Testing: A Tutorial.如何从单基因药物遗传学检测过渡到预测性面板检测:教程。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;108(3):557-565. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1912. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics.用于药物遗传学的口腔拭子评估
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jun 14;11(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3476-5.
6
Incidence and clearance of oral human papillomavirus infection: A population-based cohort study in rural China.口腔人乳头瘤病毒感染的发病率及清除情况:一项基于中国农村人群的队列研究
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 17;8(35):59831-59844. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16306. eCollection 2017 Aug 29.
7
Differences in AMY1 Gene Copy Numbers Derived from Blood, Buccal Cells and Saliva Using Quantitative and Droplet Digital PCR Methods: Flagging the Pitfall.使用定量PCR和数字PCR方法检测血液、颊黏膜细胞和唾液中AMY1基因拷贝数的差异:警惕潜在问题
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170767. eCollection 2017.
8
Evaluation of p16 hypermethylation in oral submucous fibrosis: A quantitative and comparative analysis in buccal cells and saliva using real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction.口腔黏膜下纤维化中p16基因高甲基化的评估:使用实时甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应对颊黏膜细胞和唾液进行定量及比较分析。
South Asian J Cancer. 2016 Apr-Jun;5(2):73-9. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.181645.
9
Design of a protocol for obtaining genomic DNA from saliva using mouthwash: Samples taken from patients with periodontal disease.一种使用漱口水从唾液中获取基因组DNA的方案设计:取自牙周病患者的样本。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016 May-Aug;6(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
10
Dentistry to the rescue of missing children: A review.牙科助力寻找失踪儿童:综述
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016 Jan-Apr;8(1):7-12. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.176947.