Suppr超能文献

评估研究与临床实践中的生活质量。

Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practice.

作者信息

Jacobsen Paul B, Davis Kimberly, Cella David

机构信息

Psychosocial and Palliative Care Program, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA.

出版信息

Oncology (Williston Park). 2002 Sep;16(9 Suppl 10):133-9.

Abstract

There is a growing recognition in oncology of the importance of maintaining or improving patients' quality of life (QOL) throughout the disease course. With this goal in mind, many clinical trials in oncology now seek to evaluate QOL endpoints. In using QOL measures as research tools, investigators need to consider which instrument is best suited to addressing the issues under study, how often and when to administer the instrument, and how to deal with data that may be missing due to toxicity, morbidity, or mortality. Findings from QOL research can inform clinical care by providing information about the likely impact of disease and its treatment on functioning and wellbeing, identifying common problems, and developing effective interventions to deal with these problems. The routine assessment of QOL may also have clinical uses at the individual patient level. These uses include fostering patient-provider communication, identifying frequently overlooked problems, prioritizing problems, and evaluating the impact of palliative and rehabilitative efforts. Although several barriers exist to routine assessment of quality of life in clinical practice, several strategies can be used to successfully overcome these barriers.

摘要

肿瘤学界越来越认识到在整个疾病过程中维持或改善患者生活质量(QOL)的重要性。出于这一目标,现在肿瘤学领域的许多临床试验都试图评估生活质量终点。在将生活质量测量作为研究工具使用时,研究人员需要考虑哪种工具最适合解决所研究的问题、该工具的施用频率和时间,以及如何处理因毒性、发病率或死亡率可能缺失的数据。生活质量研究的结果可以通过提供有关疾病及其治疗对功能和幸福感可能产生的影响的信息、识别常见问题以及制定应对这些问题的有效干预措施,为临床护理提供参考。生活质量的常规评估在个体患者层面也可能具有临床用途。这些用途包括促进医患沟通、识别经常被忽视的问题、确定问题的优先级以及评估姑息治疗和康复努力的影响。尽管在临床实践中对生活质量进行常规评估存在一些障碍,但可以使用几种策略来成功克服这些障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验