Suppr超能文献

LINK SB Charité人工椎间盘的历史、设计与生物力学

History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc.

作者信息

Link Helmut D

机构信息

Waldemar Link GmbH & Co, Barkhausenweg 10, 22339 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2002 Oct;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S98-S105. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0475-x. Epub 2002 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-002-0475-x
PMID:12384729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3611577/
Abstract

The SB Charité I artificial disc was developed in 1982 by Schellnack and Büttner-Janz and modified as the Mark II version in 1984. Both types were manufactured in the former German Democratic Republic (GDR). Today's design, the SB Charité III, was first produced by LINK in 1987. Five sizes of the artificial disc in various angulations are available today, with a double coating of titanium/calciumphosphate. Designed with a three-component set-up, the SB Charité mimics the physiological segmental motion. The possibility of translation in the SB Charité provides proper biomechanical function and protects the zygapophysial joints. Results of biomechanical testing showed a sufficient cold-flow resistance of the UHMWPE (Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene) sliding core and confirmed the negligible abrasion rate. The LINK SB Charité disc is a safe and effective operative treatment for discogenic low back pain. Long-term results (10 years and more) have been published.

摘要

SB Charité I型人工椎间盘由舍尔纳克和布特纳-扬茨于1982年研发，并于1984年改进为Mark II版本。这两种类型均在前德意志民主共和国（东德）生产。如今的设计，即SB Charité III型，于1987年由LINK首次生产。如今有五种不同角度的人工椎间盘尺寸可供选择，采用钛/磷酸钙双层涂层。SB Charité采用三分组件设计，可模拟生理节段运动。SB Charité中的平移可能性提供了适当的生物力学功能，并保护了小关节。生物力学测试结果表明，超高分子量聚乙烯（UHMWPE）滑动核心具有足够的抗冷流性，并证实磨损率可忽略不计。LINK SB Charité椎间盘是治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛的一种安全有效的手术方法。长期结果（10年及以上）已发表。

相似文献

1
History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc.
Eur Spine J. 2002 Oct;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S98-S105. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0475-x. Epub 2002 Sep 5.
2
Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):374-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
3
[Basic principles of successful implantation of the SB Charité model LINK intervertebral disk endoprosthesis].
Orthopade. 2002 May;31(5):441-53. doi: 10.1007/s00132-001-0297-2.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S110-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092209.27573.90.
5
Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
Spine J. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.004.
6
Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States.
Eur Spine J. 2002 Oct;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S106-10. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0439-1. Epub 2002 Sep 13.
7
Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):590-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.06.015.
8
Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.015.
9
Analysis of porous ingrowth in intervertebral disc prostheses: a nonhuman primate model.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 15;28(4):332-40. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048504.08086.42.
10
Biomechanics of the SB Charité lumbar intervertebral disc endoprosthesis.
Int Orthop. 1989;13(3):173-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00268042.

引用本文的文献

1
The Future of Motion Preservation and Arthroplasty in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine.
J Clin Med. 2025 May 11;14(10):3337. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103337.
2
REPRINT: Surgical Treatment for Discogenic Low-Back Pain: Lumbar Arthroplasty Results in Superior Pain Reduction and Disability Level Improvement Compared With Lumbar Fusion.
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Apr 7;19(S2):S38-S44. doi: 10.14444/8744.
3
ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design.
N Am Spine Soc J. 2020 Jul 20;2:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100016. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Long-Term Residual-Mobility and Adjacent Segment Disease After Total Lumbar Disc Replacement.
Global Spine J. 2021 Sep;11(7):1032-1039. doi: 10.1177/2192568220935813. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
Global Spine J. 2017 Aug;7(5):452-459. doi: 10.1177/2192568217712714. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
6
Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons.
SAS J. 2011 Sep 1;5(3):75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001. eCollection 2011.
7
Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence.
SAS J. 2011 Mar 1;5(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.12.001. eCollection 2011.
8
Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up.
SAS J. 2010 Mar 1;4(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2009.12.002. eCollection 2010.
9
Retrieval analysis of motion preserving spinal devices and periprosthetic tissues.
SAS J. 2009 Dec 1;3(4):161-77. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2009.11.003. eCollection 2009.
10
Surgical treatment for discogenic low-back pain: lumbar arthroplasty results in superior pain reduction and disability level improvement compared with lumbar fusion.
SAS J. 2007 Feb 1;1(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2006-0002-RR. eCollection 2007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验