Suppr超能文献

使用雷贝拉唑或兰索拉唑联合阿莫西林和克拉霉素根除克拉霉素耐药幽门螺杆菌的根除率。

Eradication rates of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori using either rabeprazole or lansoprazole plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin.

作者信息

Murakami K, Sato R, Okimoto T, Nasu M, Fujioka T, Kodama M, Kagawa J, Sato S, Abe H, Arita T

机构信息

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Oita Medical University, Oita, Japan.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Nov;16(11):1933-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01368.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The resistance of Helicobacter pylori to clarithromycin has become one of the primary reasons for eradication failure.

AIM

To compare the eradication rates of triple therapy using amoxicillin (A), clarithromycin (C) and rabeprazole (R) or lansoprazole (L) against clarithromycin-sensitive and clarithromycin-resistant strains.

METHODS

Two hundred and ninety-five patients were randomly divided into four groups and treated for 1 week: 147 cases were treated with RAC, i.e. 49 cases with R20C400 (10 mg R + 750 mg A + 200 mg C, twice daily), 48 cases with R40C400 (20 mg R + 750 mg A + 200 mg C, twice daily) and 50 cases with R40C800 (20 mg R + 750 mg A + 400 mg C, twice daily); 148 cases with treated with LAC (30 mg L + 750 mg A + 200 mg C, twice daily).

RESULTS

According to intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, the eradication rates were 88% and 91% with RAC and 78% and 81% with LAC; the eradication rates with R20C400, R40C400 and R40C800 were 94%, 81% and 86%, respectively, in the intention-to-treat analysis. In addition, the eradication rates for clarithromycin-sensitive strains with RAC and LAC were 98% and 89%, respectively, and for clarithromycin-resistant strains with RAC and LAC were 8.1% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The eradication rate was significantly higher with RAC than LAC. The eradication rate for clarithromycin-resistant strains was low in both groups, and an improved eradication rate could not be achieved by changing the dose of clarithromycin or proton pump inhibitor.

摘要

背景

幽门螺杆菌对克拉霉素耐药已成为根除失败的主要原因之一。

目的

比较使用阿莫西林(A)、克拉霉素(C)和雷贝拉唑(R)或兰索拉唑(L)的三联疗法对克拉霉素敏感菌株和克拉霉素耐药菌株的根除率。

方法

295例患者随机分为四组,治疗1周:147例采用RAC治疗,即49例采用R20C400(10毫克R + 750毫克A + 200毫克C,每日两次),48例采用R40C400(20毫克R + 750毫克A + 200毫克C,每日两次),50例采用R40C800(20毫克R + 750毫克A + 400毫克C,每日两次);148例采用LAC治疗(30毫克L + 750毫克A + 200毫克C,每日两次)。

结果

根据意向性分析和符合方案分析,RAC的根除率分别为88%和91%,LAC的根除率分别为78%和81%;在意向性分析中,R20C400、R40C400和R40C800的根除率分别为94%、81%和86%。此外,RAC和LAC对克拉霉素敏感菌株的根除率分别为98%和89%,对克拉霉素耐药菌株的根除率分别为8.1%和0%。

结论

RAC的根除率显著高于LAC。两组中对克拉霉素耐药菌株的根除率均较低,且通过改变克拉霉素或质子泵抑制剂的剂量无法提高根除率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验