Ingenito Edward P, Loring Stephen H, Moy Marilyn L, Mentzer Steven J, Swanson Scott J, Reilly John J
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jan;94(1):20-30. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00898.2001. Epub 2002 Sep 20.
This paper examines potential physiological mechanisms responsible for improvement after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). In 25 patients (63 +/- 9 yr; 11 men, 14 women), spirometry [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC)], lung volumes [residual volume (RV) and total lung capacity (TLC)], small airway resistance, recoil pressures, and respiratory muscle contractility (RMC) were measured before and 4-6 mo after LVRS. Data were interpreted to assess how changes in each component of lung mechanics affect overall function. Among responders (DeltaFEV(1) > or = 12%; 150 ml), improvement was primarily due to an increase in FVC, not to FEV(1)-to-FVC ratio. Among nonresponders, FEV(1), FVC, and RV/TLC did not change after surgery, although recoil pressure increased in both groups. Both groups experienced a reduction in RMC after LVRS. In conclusion, LVRS improves function in emphysema by resizing the lung relative to the chest wall by reducing RV. LVRS does not change airway resistance but decreases RMC, which attenuates the potential benefits of LVRS that are generated by reducing RV/TLC. Among nonresponders, recoil pressure increased out of proportion to reduced volume, such that no increase in vital capacity or improvement in FEV(1) occurred.
本文探讨了肺减容手术(LVRS)后病情改善的潜在生理机制。对25例患者(63±9岁;男性11例,女性14例)在LVRS术前及术后4 - 6个月测量了肺功能(1秒用力呼气容积[FEV(1)]和用力肺活量[FVC])、肺容积(残气量[RV]和肺总量[TLC])、小气道阻力、回缩压和呼吸肌收缩力(RMC)。对数据进行解读以评估肺力学各组成部分的变化如何影响整体功能。在反应者(ΔFEV(1)≥12%;150 ml)中,改善主要归因于FVC的增加,而非FEV(1)/FVC比值。在无反应者中,术后FEV(1)、FVC和RV/TLC未发生变化,尽管两组的回缩压均升高。两组在LVRS后RMC均降低。总之,LVRS通过减少RV使肺相对于胸壁重新调整大小,从而改善肺气肿患者的功能。LVRS不改变气道阻力,但降低RMC,这减弱了因降低RV/TLC而产生的LVRS的潜在益处。在无反应者中,回缩压升高与容积减少不成比例,因此肺活量未增加,FEV(1)也未改善。