Montori Victor M, Dinneen Sean F, Gorman Colum A, Zimmerman Bruce R, Rizza Robert A, Bjornsen Susan S, Green Erin M, Bryant Sandra C, Smith Steven A
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov;25(11):1952-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.1952.
The Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project sought to assess models of community-based diabetes care and use of a diabetes electronic management system (DEMS). Planned care is a redesigned model of chronic disease care that involves guideline implementation, support of self-management, and use of clinical information systems.
We studied adult diabetic patients attending three primary care practice sites in Wisconsin and Minnesota. We implemented planned care at all sites and DEMS in the practice of 16 primary care providers. We assessed quality of diabetes care using standard indicators for 200 patients randomly selected from each site at baseline and at 24 months of implementation. We used multivariable analyses to estimate the association between planned care and DEMS and each quality indicator.
Planned care was associated with improvements in measurement of HbA(1c) (odds ratio 7.0 [95% CI 4.2-11.6]), HDL cholesterol (5.6 [4.1-7.5]), and microalbuminuria (5.3 [3.5-8.0]), as well as the provision of tobacco advice (6.9 [4.7-10.1]), among other performance measures. DEMS use was associated with improvements in all indicators, including microalbuminuria (3.2 [1.9-5.2]), retinal examination (2.4 [1.5-3.9]), foot examinations (2.3 [1.2-4.4]), and self-management support (2.6 [1.7-3.8]). Although planned care was associated with improvements in metabolic control, we observed no additional metabolic benefit when providers used DEMS.
Planned care was associated with improved performance and metabolic outcomes in primary care. DEMS use augmented the impact of planned care on performance outcomes but not on metabolic outcomes. Optimal identification of the best translation of evidence to diabetes practice will require longer follow-up or new care-delivery models.
梅奥医疗系统糖尿病转化项目旨在评估基于社区的糖尿病护理模式以及糖尿病电子管理系统(DEMS)的使用情况。计划护理是一种重新设计的慢性病护理模式,包括指南实施、自我管理支持以及临床信息系统的使用。
我们对在威斯康星州和明尼苏达州的三个初级保健实践点就诊的成年糖尿病患者进行了研究。我们在所有站点实施了计划护理,并在16名初级保健提供者的实践中使用了DEMS。我们使用标准指标评估了从每个站点基线时和实施24个月时随机选取的200名患者的糖尿病护理质量。我们使用多变量分析来估计计划护理和DEMS与每个质量指标之间的关联。
计划护理与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量改善(优势比7.0 [95%可信区间4.2 - 11.6])、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(5.6 [4.1 - 7.5])、微量白蛋白尿(5.3 [3.5 - 8.0])以及提供烟草建议(6.9 [4.7 - 10.1])等其他绩效指标相关。DEMS的使用与所有指标的改善相关,包括微量白蛋白尿(3.2 [1.9 - 5.2])、视网膜检查(2.4 [1.5 - 3.9])、足部检查(2.3 [1.2 - 4.4])以及自我管理支持(2.6 [1.7 - 3.8])。尽管计划护理与代谢控制改善相关,但当提供者使用DEMS时,我们未观察到额外的代谢益处。
计划护理与初级保健中的绩效改善和代谢结果相关。DEMS的使用增强了计划护理对绩效结果的影响,但对代谢结果没有影响。要最佳地确定将证据转化为糖尿病实践的最佳方式,需要更长时间的随访或新的护理提供模式。