Brubacher Jeffrey R, Purssell Roy, Kent Debra A
British Columbia Drug and Poison Information Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
CMAJ. 2002 Oct 29;167(9):992-6.
The Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (CPS) is a collection of monographs written by pharmaceutical companies and published by the Canadian Pharmacists Association. The CPS is widely available and is consulted frequently by Canadian physicians. We examined overdose management advice contained in the CPS to see whether it reflects current standards.
We restricted our review to 10 classes of medication for which an overdose is frequently fatal: acetaminophen, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, digoxin, lithium, opioids, salicylates, tricyclic antidepressants, theophylline and valproic acid. A panel of 3 toxicologists arrived at a consensus on indicated, contraindicated and futile interventions for each of these classes of drug. Monographs were then rated for their inclusion of essential interventions as excellent (listed all interventions and unique supportive care issues and gave correct and complete indications), good (listed the key interventions and gave correct and complete indications), fair (listed the key indications but failed to give proper indications) or poor (failed to list the key interventions). Monographs were also rated on how well they warned against contraindicated interventions as excellent (did not advocate any futile or contraindicated treatments and warned against contraindicated treatments), good (did not advocate any futile or contraindicated treatments), fair (did not advocate any contraindicated treatments but did list some simple futile treatments) or poor (advocated contraindicated or complicated futile treatments, such as unnecessary hemodialysis). We also considered whether the monograph would allow a clinician to manage an overdose, whether it served to refresh one's memory and whether it was simply misleading or dangerous.
We reviewed 119 monographs, of which 25 (21%) were adequate to allow a clinician to manage an overdose. Another 25 monographs were not adequate to allow a clinician to manage an overdose but would serve to refresh the memory regarding key management points. Sixty monographs (50%) contained misleading or dangerous advice. Nine monographs (8%) did not fall into any of these categories. In terms of listing essential interventions, 61 monographs (51%) were poor, 35 (29%) were fair, 22 (18%) were good, and 1 (1%) was excellent. For warning against contraindicated interventions, 57 monographs (48%) were poor, 9 (8%) were fair, 51 (43%) were good, and 2 (2%) were excellent.
Overdose management advice in the CPS is inadequate in most cases and is misleading or dangerous in half of the monographs examined. These sections should be omitted or rewritten to reflect current standards of care. Physicians should refer to authoritative sources (e.g., current toxicology texts, computerized databases or local poison control centres) for poisoning management advice.
《药品及特殊用品汇编》(CPS)是由制药公司撰写并由加拿大药剂师协会出版的专论集。CPS广泛可得,加拿大医生经常查阅。我们研究了CPS中包含的过量用药管理建议,以查看其是否反映了当前标准。
我们将审查范围限制在10类过量用药常致死的药物:对乙酰氨基酚、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂、地高辛、锂盐、阿片类药物、水杨酸盐、三环类抗抑郁药、茶碱和丙戊酸。由3名毒理学家组成的小组就这些药物类别中指明的、禁忌的和无效的干预措施达成了共识。然后根据专论对基本干预措施的纳入情况进行评分,优秀(列出了所有干预措施和独特的支持性护理问题,并给出了正确且完整的适应症)、良好(列出了关键干预措施并给出了正确且完整的适应症)、一般(列出了关键适应症但未给出适当的适应症)或差(未列出关键干预措施)。专论还根据其对禁忌干预措施的警示情况进行评分,优秀(不提倡任何无效或禁忌的治疗,并对禁忌治疗进行了警示)、良好(不提倡任何无效或禁忌的治疗)、一般(不提倡任何禁忌治疗,但列出了一些简单的无效治疗)或差(提倡禁忌或复杂的无效治疗,如不必要的血液透析)。我们还考虑了该专论是否能让临床医生管理过量用药情况、是否有助于唤起记忆以及是否具有误导性或危险性。
我们审查了119篇专论,其中25篇(21%)足以让临床医生管理过量用药情况。另外25篇专论虽不足以让临床医生管理过量用药情况,但有助于唤起对关键管理要点的记忆。60篇专论(50%)包含误导性或危险的建议。9篇专论(8%)不属于上述任何类别。在列出基本干预措施方面,61篇专论(51%)较差,35篇(29%)一般,22篇(18%)良好,1篇(1%)优秀。在对禁忌干预措施的警示方面,57篇专论(48%)较差,9篇(8%)一般,51篇(43%)良好,2篇(2%)优秀。
CPS中的过量用药管理建议在大多数情况下不充分,在所审查的专论中有一半具有误导性或危险性。这些部分应予以省略或重写以反映当前的护理标准。医生应参考权威资料(如当前的毒理学教材、计算机数据库或当地的中毒控制中心)获取中毒管理建议。