• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制造商产品说明书中儿科药物安全性的记录:对《加拿大药品和特殊产品汇编》的横断面评估

Documentation of pediatric drug safety in manufacturers' product monographs: a cross-sectional evaluation of the canadian compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialities.

作者信息

Uppal Navjeet K, Dupuis Lee L, Parshuram Christopher S

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Paediatr Drugs. 2008;10(3):193-7. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200810030-00007.

DOI:10.2165/00148581-200810030-00007
PMID:18454571
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the provision of pediatric drug safety information in a national formulary of manufacturers' drug product monographs.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional evaluation of comprehensive product monographs contained in the 2005 Canadian Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialities (CPS). We abstracted data describing indications for prescription, statements about pediatric safety, available preparations, and provision of dosing guidelines. For each monograph we classified pediatric safety data as either present, present but limited or absent. We then described the pediatric safety data in CPS monographs for drugs listed in the published formulary of the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

RESULTS

A total of 2232 product monographs were screened; 684 were excluded and 1548 (66%) were further analyzed. 1462 (94%) had indications that did not exclude children. Pediatric safety information was present in 592 (38%), present but limited in 148 (10%), and absent in 808 (52%) drug monographs. Safety statements were absent in 224 (14%) drug monographs that provided both dosing guidelines and formulations suitable for administration to children, and in 214 (52%) of 411 drugs in the pediatric hospital formulary.

CONCLUSION

We evaluated a widely available national source of pediatric prescribing information. Safety data for children was not mentioned in more than half of the product monographs. Moreover, the provision of safety data was discordant with indications for prescription, the availability of pediatric formulations, and dosing guidelines within the monographs, and with inclusion in a pediatric hospital formulary. Our study suggests that the presentation of pediatric safety data in drug product monographs can be improved to better inform prescribing and to optimize pharmacotherapy in children.

摘要

目的

描述在一份制造商药品说明书的国家处方集里儿科药物安全信息的提供情况。

方法

我们对2005年《加拿大药品及特殊制品汇编》(CPS)中的综合产品说明书进行了横断面评估。我们提取了描述处方适应症、儿科安全性声明、可用制剂以及给药指南提供情况的数据。对于每份说明书,我们将儿科安全数据分类为存在、存在但有限或不存在。然后我们描述了加拿大安大略省多伦多市病童医院已发布处方集中列出的药物在CPS说明书中的儿科安全数据。

结果

共筛选了2232份产品说明书;排除684份,对1548份(66%)进行了进一步分析。1462份(94%)有不排除儿童的适应症。592份(38%)药物说明书中有儿科安全信息,148份(10%)存在但有限,808份(52%)不存在。在提供了适合儿童给药的给药指南和制剂的224份(14%)药物说明书中,以及在儿科医院处方集的411种药物中的214份(52%)中,没有安全声明。

结论

我们评估了一个广泛可用的国家儿科处方信息来源。超过一半的产品说明书未提及儿童安全数据。此外,安全数据的提供与处方适应症、儿科制剂的可用性、说明书中的给药指南以及是否被纳入儿科医院处方集不一致。我们的研究表明,药品说明书中儿科安全数据的呈现方式可以改进,以便更好地为处方提供信息并优化儿童药物治疗。

相似文献

1
Documentation of pediatric drug safety in manufacturers' product monographs: a cross-sectional evaluation of the canadian compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialities.制造商产品说明书中儿科药物安全性的记录:对《加拿大药品和特殊产品汇编》的横断面评估
Paediatr Drugs. 2008;10(3):193-7. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200810030-00007.
2
Pediatric drug data in Canadian drug monographs: a descriptive analysis.加拿大药品说明书中的儿科用药数据:描述性分析
CMAJ Open. 2020 Aug 31;8(3):E522-E529. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200010. Print 2020 Jul-Sep.
3
A comparison of Canadian general pediatric dosing publications.加拿大普通儿科用药剂量出版物的比较。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Fall;10(3):107-10.
4
Information for physicians and pharmacists about drugs that might cause dry mouth: a study of monographs and published literature.关于可能导致口干的药物的医师和药剂师信息:专论和已发表文献的研究。
Drugs Aging. 2014 Jan;31(1):55-65. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0141-5.
5
Agents against pediatric diarrhea. Assessing the information companies supply to Canadian physicians.治疗小儿腹泻的药物。评估各公司向加拿大医生提供的信息。
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Dec;40:2082-7.
6
Administration guidelines for parenteral drug therapy. Part I: Pediatric patients.胃肠外用药治疗的给药指南。第一部分:儿科患者。
J Pharm Technol. 1989 May-Jun;5(3):101-28. doi: 10.1177/875512258900500306.
7
Salty broth for salicylate poisoning? Adequacy of overdose management advice in the 2001 Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties.用含盐肉汤治疗水杨酸盐中毒?2001年《药品及特殊用品手册》中过量用药管理建议是否充分?
CMAJ. 2002 Oct 29;167(9):992-6.
8
The Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties: a critical analysis.《药品和保健品汇编》:批判性分析
Int J Health Serv. 1983;13(1):107-18. doi: 10.2190/RMQL-RQ29-WGHK-7V5J.
9
Assessing controlled substance prescribing errors in a pediatric teaching hospital: an analysis of the safety of analgesic prescription practice in the transition from the hospital to home.评估一家儿科教学医院的管制药品处方错误:对从医院到家庭过渡阶段镇痛处方实践安全性的分析。
J Pain. 2009 Feb;10(2):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
10
Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies.儿科药物标签:提高儿科治疗的安全性和有效性。
JAMA. 2003 Aug 20;290(7):905-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.905.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes, knowledge and views on off-label prescribing in children among healthcare professionals in Malaysia.马来西亚医护专业人员对儿童药品标签外使用的态度、知识和看法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Aug;41(4):1074-1084. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00862-y. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
2
A Comprehensive List of Items to be Included on a Pediatric Drug Monograph.儿科药物专论中应包含的项目综合清单。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan-Feb;22(1):48-59. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.1.48.
3
Drug formulations that require less than 0.1 mL of stock solution to prepare doses for infants and children.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug discovery in jeopardy.药物研发面临危机。
J Clin Invest. 2006 Nov;116(11):2837-42. doi: 10.1172/JCI29999.
2
Off-label and unlicensed prescribing for newborns and children in different settings: a review of the literature and a consideration about drug safety.不同环境下新生儿及儿童的超说明书用药与未获许可用药:文献综述及药物安全性考量
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2006 Sep;5(5):703-18. doi: 10.1517/14740338.5.5.703.
3
The newborn drug development initiative.新生儿药物开发倡议。
需要少于 0.1 毫升原液即可为婴儿和儿童配制剂量的药物制剂。
CMAJ. 2011 Mar 8;183(4):E246-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100467. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
4
Safety and transparency of pediatric drug trials.儿科药物试验的安全性与透明度。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Dec;163(12):1080-6. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.229.
5
Pharmacotherapy in pediatric critical illness: a prospective observational study.
Paediatr Drugs. 2009;11(5):323-31. doi: 10.2165/11310670-000000000-00000.
Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3 Pt 2):S1-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0620B.
4
A prospective questionnaire assessment of attitudes and experiences of off label prescribing among hospital based paediatricians.一项针对医院儿科医生超说明书用药态度与经历的前瞻性问卷调查评估。
Arch Dis Child. 2006 Jul;91(7):584-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.081828. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
5
A literature review on off-label drug use in children.关于儿童超说明书用药的文献综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2005 Sep;164(9):552-8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-005-1698-8. Epub 2005 May 24.
6
The use of unlicensed and off-label medicines in the neonate.新生儿中未获许可药物和超说明书用药的使用情况。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 Apr;10(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.11.003. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
7
Off licence and off label prescribing in children: litigation fears for physicians.儿童的无执照和超说明书用药:医生面临诉讼风险。
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Feb;90 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i17-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.058867.
8
Developmental pharmacology--drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children.发育药理学——婴幼儿的药物处置、作用及治疗
N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 18;349(12):1157-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035092.
9
Healthy children as subjects in pharmaceutical research.健康儿童作为药物研究的受试者。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2003;24(2):149-59. doi: 10.1023/a:1024694828858.
10
Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies.儿科药物标签:提高儿科治疗的安全性和有效性。
JAMA. 2003 Aug 20;290(7):905-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.905.