Suppr超能文献

氟伏沙明治疗强迫症:与氯米帕明相比疗效相似,但耐受性更佳。

Fluvoxamine in obsessive-compulsive disorder: similar efficacy but superior tolerability in comparison with clomipramine.

作者信息

Mundo Emanuela, Rouillon Frédéric, Figuera M. Luisa, Stigler Michael

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Clarke Division R30, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Hum Psychopharmacol. 2001 Aug;16(6):461-468. doi: 10.1002/hup.317.

Abstract

Some meta-analyses have suggested that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are less effective than clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aim of this double-blind, randomised, multicentre study was to directly compare the efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in patients with OCD. A total of 227 patients were randomised to flexible doses of fluvoxamine or clomipramine (both 150-300 mg/day) for 10 weeks. Fluvoxamine and clomipramine were both clinically effective and there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups, at any visit, on the National Institute of Mental Health Obsessive-Compulsive global rating scale, the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale (total score and obsession and compulsion subscores), the Clinical Global Impression severity of illness and global improvement subscales, the Clinical Anxiety Scale and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. However, there were differences in safety between the two treatments. Compared with fluvoxamine-treated patients, those treated with clomipramine had more anticholinergic side effects (dry mouth, constipation and tremor) and premature withdrawals due to adverse events (18 versus 9). The results from this controlled study indicate that fluvoxamine is as effective as clomipramine in the treatment of OCD but has a better tolerability profile. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

一些荟萃分析表明,在治疗强迫症(OCD)方面,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)不如氯米帕明有效。这项双盲、随机、多中心研究的目的是直接比较氟伏沙明和氯米帕明对强迫症患者的疗效和安全性。共有227例患者被随机分配接受氟伏沙明或氯米帕明的灵活剂量治疗(均为150 - 300毫克/天),为期10周。氟伏沙明和氯米帕明在临床上均有效,在任何访视时,两个治疗组在国立精神卫生研究所强迫症总体评定量表、耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(总分及强迫观念和强迫行为子分数)、临床总体印象疾病严重程度和总体改善子量表、临床焦虑量表以及17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表上均无统计学显著差异。然而,两种治疗方法在安全性方面存在差异。与接受氟伏沙明治疗的患者相比,接受氯米帕明治疗的患者有更多的抗胆碱能副作用(口干、便秘和震颤)以及因不良事件导致的提前退出研究(分别为18例和9例)。这项对照研究的结果表明,氟伏沙明在治疗强迫症方面与氯米帕明一样有效,但耐受性更好。版权所有2001约翰威立父子有限公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验