McDougle C J, Goodman W K, Leckman J F, Barr L C, Heninger G R, Price L H
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Oct;13(5):354-8.
This retrospective case-controlled analysis evaluated treatment response to the serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), with or without a comorbid chronic tic disorder. Thirty-three fluvoxamine-treated OCD patients with a concurrent chronic tic disorder were compared with 33 age- and sex-matched OCD patients without chronic tics who had received fluvoxamine treatment in the same setting during the same period of time and in a similar manner. Although both groups of patients demonstrated statistically significant reductions in obsessive-compulsive, depressive, and anxiety symptoms with fluvoxamine treatment, the frequency and magnitude of response of obsessive-compulsive symptoms was significantly different between the two groups. A clinically meaningful improvement in obsessive-compulsive symptoms occurred in only 21% of OCD patients with comorbid chronic tics compared with a 52% response rate in OCD patients without chronic tics. Moreover, OCD patients with a concurrent chronic tic disorder showed only a 17% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores compared with a 32% decrease in the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in those OCD patients without chronic tics. These results suggest that serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy may be less efficacious for improving obsessive-compulsive symptoms in OCD patients with than without tics. Combined with differences in the clinical phenomenology between these two groups, these treatment response data support the hypothesis that OCD patients with a comorbid chronic tic disorder may be a clinically meaningful subtype.
这项回顾性病例对照分析评估了5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂氟伏沙明对伴有或不伴有慢性抽动障碍共病的强迫症(OCD)患者的治疗反应。将33例接受氟伏沙明治疗且伴有慢性抽动障碍的OCD患者与33例年龄和性别匹配、在同一时期于相同环境中以相似方式接受氟伏沙明治疗但无慢性抽动的OCD患者进行比较。尽管两组患者经氟伏沙明治疗后,强迫、抑郁和焦虑症状均有统计学意义的显著减轻,但两组患者强迫症状的反应频率和程度存在显著差异。伴有慢性抽动障碍共病的OCD患者中,仅有21%的患者强迫症状有临床意义的改善,而无慢性抽动的OCD患者的反应率为52%。此外,伴有慢性抽动障碍共病的OCD患者耶鲁-布朗强迫量表评分仅降低17% , 而无慢性抽动的OCD患者强迫症状严重程度降低32%。这些结果表明,5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂单药治疗对伴有抽动的OCD患者改善强迫症状的疗效可能低于不伴有抽动的患者。结合这两组患者临床现象学的差异,这些治疗反应数据支持了伴有慢性抽动障碍共病的OCD患者可能是一个具有临床意义的亚型这一假说。