• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A large-scale observational comparison of antidepressants and their effects.抗抑郁药及其疗效的大规模观察性比较。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Oct;178:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
2
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
3
Comparative Cardiac Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在维持性血液透析患者中的心脏安全性比较。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Apr;30(4):611-623. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018101032. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in youths.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与青少年 2 型糖尿病风险。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Dec 1;318:231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.094. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
[The transfer of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to human milk].[选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂向母乳中的转移]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Jan 20;121(2):199-203.
6
[Fluvoxamine in the treatment of depressive disorders in alcohol dependence: results of randomized open-label comparative study].[氟伏沙明治疗酒精依赖中的抑郁障碍:随机开放标签对照研究结果]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2021;121(12):57-62. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112112157.
7
Comparative cardiovascular safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) among Chinese senile depression patients: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.中国老年抑郁症患者中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的心血管安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15786. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015786.
8
A comparative study of QT prolongation with serotonin reuptake inhibitors.与 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂相关的 QT 延长的对比研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Oct;234(20):3075-3081. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4685-7. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的药代动力学-药效学关系
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Dec;31(6):444-69. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199631060-00004.
10
A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline: Are they all alike?艾司西酞普兰、帕罗西汀和舍曲林的比较评价:它们都一样吗?
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jul;29(4):185-96. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000023.

本文引用的文献

1
Web Search Query Volume Correlates With Prescription Volumes of Antidepressants and Antipsychotics in the Netherlands and United Kingdom: An Explorative Study.网络搜索查询量与荷兰和英国抗抑郁药及抗精神病药的处方量相关:一项探索性研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023;43(3):220-227. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001690.
2
The complex clinical response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depression: a network perspective.抑郁症中选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的复杂临床反应:网络视角。
Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 21;13(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02285-2.
3
Risks of Digestive System Side-Effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Patients with Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis.抑郁症患者中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的消化系统副作用风险:一项网状Meta分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Aug 13;18:799-812. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S363404. eCollection 2022.
4
The knowns and unknowns of SSRI treatment in young people with depression and anxiety: efficacy, predictors, and mechanisms of action.SSRIs 治疗青少年抑郁和焦虑的已知和未知:疗效、预测因素和作用机制。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;8(9):824-835. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00154-1.
5
Optimizing prediction of response to antidepressant medications using machine learning and integrated genetic, clinical, and demographic data.利用机器学习和综合遗传、临床及人口统计学数据优化抗抑郁药物反应的预测。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 8;11(1):381. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01488-3.
6
Understanding Side Effects of Antidepressants: Large-scale Longitudinal Study on Social Media Data.了解抗抑郁药的副作用:基于社交媒体数据的大规模纵向研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Mar 19;8(3):e26589. doi: 10.2196/26589.
7
Impact of online mental health screening tools on help-seeking, care receipt, and suicidal ideation and suicidal intent: Evidence from internet search behavior in a large U.S. cohort.在线心理健康筛查工具对求助、获得护理和自杀意念及自杀意图的影响:来自美国大型队列中互联网搜索行为的证据。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jan;145:276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
8
A Social Media Study on the Effects of Psychiatric Medication Use.一项关于精神科药物使用效果的社交媒体研究。
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2019 Jun 7;13:440-451.
9
Paroxetine in the treatment of premature ejaculation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.帕罗西汀治疗早泄:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Urol. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0431-7.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis: Dose-response curve of SSRIs and SNRIs in anxiety disorders.系统评价和荟萃分析:SSRIs 和 SNRIs 在焦虑障碍中的剂量-反应关系。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Mar;36(3):198-212. doi: 10.1002/da.22854. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

抗抑郁药及其疗效的大规模观察性比较。

A large-scale observational comparison of antidepressants and their effects.

机构信息

Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.

Microsoft Research Israel, Herzeliya, Israel; Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Oct;178:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.08.001
PMID:39163659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11398883/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) represent a diverse class of medications widely prescribed for depression and anxiety. Despite their common use, there is an absence of large-scale, real-world evidence capturing the heterogeneity in their effects on individuals. This study addresses this gap by utilizing naturalistic search data to explore the varied impact of six different SSRIs on user behavior.

METHODS

The study sample included ∼508 thousand Bing users with searches for one of six SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline) from April-December 2022, comprising 510 million queries. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to examine 30 topics (e.g., shopping, tourism, health) and 195 health symptoms (e.g., anxiety, weight gain, impotence), using each SSRI as a reference. We assessed the relative hazard ratios between drugs and, where feasible, ranked the SSRIs based on their observed effects. We used Cox proportional hazard models in order to account for both the likelihood of users searching for a particular topic or symptom and the associated time to that search. The temporal aspect aided in distinguishing between potential symptoms of the disorder, short-term medication side effects, and later appearing side effects.

RESULTS

Differences were found in search behaviors associated with each SSRI. E.g., fluvoxamine was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of searching weight gain compared to all other SSRIs (HRs 1.85-2.93). Searches following citalopram were associated with significantly higher rates of later impotence queries compared to all other SSRIs (HRs 5.11-7.76), except fluvoxamine. Fluvoxamine was associated with a significantly higher rate of health related searches than all other SSRIs (HRs 2.11-2.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals new insights into the varying SSRI impacts, suggesting distinct symptom profiles. This novel use of large-scale, naturalistic search data contributes to pharmacovigilance efforts, enhancing our understanding of intra-class variation among SSRIs, potentially uncovering previously unidentified drug effects.

摘要

背景

选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)是一类广泛用于治疗抑郁症和焦虑症的药物。尽管它们被广泛使用,但缺乏大规模的真实世界证据来捕捉它们对个体的影响的异质性。本研究利用自然搜索数据来探索六种不同 SSRIs 对用户行为的不同影响,从而填补了这一空白。

方法

研究样本包括约 50.8 万在 2022 年 4 月至 12 月期间使用 Bing 搜索六种 SSRIs(西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林)之一的用户,共包含 5.1 亿次查询。使用 Cox 比例风险模型,对 30 个主题(如购物、旅游、健康)和 195 个健康症状(如焦虑、体重增加、阳痿)进行了检查,每个 SSRI 作为参考。我们评估了药物之间的相对危险比,并在可行的情况下,根据观察到的效果对 SSRIs 进行了排序。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型,以同时考虑用户搜索特定主题或症状的可能性以及与该搜索相关的时间。时间方面有助于区分潜在的疾病症状、短期药物副作用和后来出现的副作用。

结果

发现了与每种 SSRI 相关的搜索行为差异。例如,与所有其他 SSRIs 相比,氟伏沙明与搜索体重增加的可能性显著更高(HRs 1.85-2.93)。与所有其他 SSRIs 相比,西酞普兰的搜索与随后出现的阳痿查询的发生率显著更高(HRs 5.11-7.76),除了氟伏沙明。与所有其他 SSRIs 相比,氟伏沙明与更高的健康相关搜索率相关(HRs 2.11-2.36)。

结论

我们的研究揭示了 SSRIs 影响的新见解,表明了不同的症状特征。这种对大规模自然搜索数据的新颖利用有助于药物警戒工作,增强了我们对 SSRIs 内类变异的理解,有可能发现以前未被识别的药物效应。