Suppr超能文献

氟伏沙明与氯米帕明治疗强迫症的多中心、随机、双盲、平行组对照研究

Fluvoxamine versus clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison.

作者信息

Freeman C P, Trimble M R, Deakin J F, Stokes T M, Ashford J J

机构信息

Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Scotland.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;55(7):301-5.

PMID:8071291
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To examine the efficacy of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in obsessive compulsive disorder and to compare their tolerabilities.

METHOD

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, fluvoxamine (100-250 mg/day) was compared with clomipramine (100-250 mg/day) for 10 weeks in the treatment of 66 psychiatric outpatients, aged 18 to 65 years, with a diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder. The main efficacy variable was the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale; secondary variables were the National Institute of Mental Health Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients withdrew prematurely, 6 in the fluvoxamine group and 11 in the clomipramine group. In the intent-to-treat population (34 fluvoxamine patients and 30 clomipramine patients), there were no significant differences with respect to the mean reduction in total Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score (last observation carried forward) at any time-point; a mean reduction of 8.6 (33%) was seen in the fluvoxamine group and 7.8 (31%) in the clomipramine group. Similar results were obtained in virtually all secondary variables. The only exception was the obsession-free interval for the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, which was significantly longer in the fluvoxamine group, especially in a population of patients with disease of > 12 months' duration (F = 5.298, df = 1, p = .026). Adverse events were mostly tolerable; 9 patients (5 receiving fluvoxamine, 4 receiving clomipramine) withdrew due to adverse events related to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Fluvoxamine and clomipramine were equally effective in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. Both agents were well tolerated; fluvoxamine produced fewer anticholinergic side effects and caused less sexual dysfunction than clomipramine, but more reports of headache and insomnia.

摘要

背景

研究氟伏沙明和氯米帕明治疗强迫症的疗效,并比较它们的耐受性。

方法

在这项多中心、随机、双盲试验中,将66例年龄在18至65岁、诊断为强迫症的精神科门诊患者,给予氟伏沙明(100 - 250毫克/天)与氯米帕明(100 - 250毫克/天)治疗10周。主要疗效变量为耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表;次要变量为美国国立精神卫生研究所全球强迫症量表和临床总体印象改善量表。

结果

17例患者提前退出,氟伏沙明组6例,氯米帕明组11例。在意向性治疗人群(34例氟伏沙明患者和30例氯米帕明患者)中,在任何时间点,耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表总分的平均降低值(末次观察值结转)均无显著差异;氟伏沙明组平均降低8.6(33%),氯米帕明组平均降低7.8(31%)。几乎所有次要变量均得到类似结果。唯一的例外是耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表的无强迫观念间隔时间,氟伏沙明组明显更长,尤其是在病程超过12个月的患者群体中(F = 5.298,自由度 = 1,p = 0.026)。不良事件大多可耐受;9例患者(5例接受氟伏沙明,4例接受氯米帕明)因与治疗相关的不良事件退出。

结论

氟伏沙明和氯米帕明治疗强迫症同样有效。两种药物耐受性均良好;氟伏沙明产生的抗胆碱能副作用较少,性功能障碍也比氯米帕明少,但头痛和失眠的报告更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验