Benkert O, Muller M, Szegedi A
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2002 Jun;17 Suppl 1:S23-6. doi: 10.1002/hup.397.
Mirtazapine is at least as effective as the tricyclic antidepressants and trazodone in a wide range of patient subgroups including in- and out-patients with moderate to severe depression. It also appears to be at least as effective as the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine in the treatment of severely depressed melancholic patients. When compared with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), mirtazapine shows a significantly earlier onset of action. Further analysis of a study comparing mirtazapine with the SSRI paroxetine indicated that early improvement was a highly sensitive predictor of later stable response for both drugs. The positive predictive value of an early improvement was significantly higher during mirtazapine treatment compared with paroxetine. The negative predictive value approached maximum values as early as week 2 with mirtazapine and week 3 with paroxetine. This suggests that the predictability of the response to treatment is better with mirtazapine than with paroxetine.
米氮平在包括中重度抑郁症的住院和门诊患者在内的广泛患者亚组中,至少与三环类抗抑郁药及曲唑酮一样有效。在治疗重度抑郁的 melancholic 患者方面,它似乎也至少与5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂文拉法辛一样有效。与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)相比,米氮平起效明显更早。一项比较米氮平和 SSRI 帕罗西汀的研究的进一步分析表明,早期改善对两种药物的后期稳定反应都是高度敏感的预测指标。与帕罗西汀相比,米氮平治疗期间早期改善的阳性预测值显著更高。米氮平治疗至第2周、帕罗西汀治疗至第3周时,阴性预测值就接近最大值。这表明米氮平对治疗反应的可预测性优于帕罗西汀。