• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[通过弗莱堡视力测试(FVT)、贝利-洛维视力表和兰多尔特环视力表测量的视力]

[Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].

作者信息

Wesemann Wolfgang

机构信息

Höhere Fachschule für Augenoptik Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2002 Sep;219(9):660-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35168.

DOI:10.1055/s-2002-35168
PMID:12410466
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

If different ways for correcting refractive errors of the human eye have to be compared, accurate and reproducible measurement procedures are necessary.

METHODS

Binocular visual acuity of 130 students without pathologies was measured with the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test, the Bailey-Lovie chart and a Landolt ring chart (4 orientations). The reproducibility of the FVT was determined by repeated measurements.

RESULTS

The average visual acuity was 1.93 +/- 0.03 (= 20/10.4) with the FVT, 1.82 +/- 0.03 (= 20/11) with the Landolt ring chart, and 1.48 +/- 0.02 (= 20/13.5) with the Bailey-Lovie chart. 50 % of all repeated measurements with the FVT were within an interval of +/- 0.035 logMAR from the mean value. 95 % were within +/- 0.1 logMAR. Results of earlier studies are discussed.

CONCLUSION

On average, visual acuity values found with the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test were slightly larger as compared to the Landolt ring chart (difference = 0.025 logMAR). Taking the maximal difference of 0.05 logMAR tolerated by the international standard DIN EN ISO 8597 into account, both tests are equivalent. The results found with the Bailey-Lovie chart were substantially lower as compared to the Landolt ring chart (difference = 0.09 logMAR). The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test has a high reproducibility and measures visual acuity on a continuous scale that is not limited to the traditional visual acuity steps. Thus, it can be recommended as a reference procedure for comparative visual acuity studies.

摘要

引言

若要比较矫正人眼屈光不正的不同方法,准确且可重复的测量程序必不可少。

方法

使用弗赖堡视力测试、贝利 - 洛维视力表和兰多尔特环视力表(4种方向)测量了130名无眼部疾病学生的双眼视力。通过重复测量确定了弗赖堡视力测试的可重复性。

结果

使用弗赖堡视力测试时平均视力为1.93±0.03(相当于20/10.4),使用兰多尔特环视力表时为1.82±0.03(相当于20/11),使用贝利 - 洛维视力表时为1.48±0.02(相当于20/13.5)。弗赖堡视力测试的所有重复测量中有50%在平均值±0.035 logMAR的区间内。95%在±0.1 logMAR内。讨论了早期研究的结果。

结论

平均而言,与兰多尔特环视力表相比,弗赖堡视力测试得出的视力值略高(差值 = 0.025 logMAR)。考虑到国际标准DIN EN ISO 8597允许的最大差值0.05 logMAR,两种测试相当。与兰多尔特环视力表相比,贝利 - 洛维视力表得出的结果显著更低(差值 = 0.09 logMAR)。弗赖堡视力测试具有高可重复性,且能在连续尺度上测量视力,不限于传统的视力分级。因此,可推荐将其作为比较视力研究的参考程序。

相似文献

1
[Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].[通过弗莱堡视力测试(FVT)、贝利-洛维视力表和兰多尔特环视力表测量的视力]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2002 Sep;219(9):660-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35168.
2
[The Freiburg Vision Test before and after cataract operation].白内障手术前后的弗赖堡视力测试
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1996 Nov;209(5):315-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035325.
3
[Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].[不同视力程度下字母视标与兰德霍尔环的相关性]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1999 Aug;215(2):119-26. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034683.
4
The practical near acuity chart (PNAC) and prediction of visual ability at near.实用近视力表(PNAC)与近视力的预测
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 Mar;20(2):90-7.
5
Design of an Arabic near visual acuity chart.阿拉伯语近视力表的设计。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997 Mar;17(2):158-60.
6
Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.提高幼儿视力测量的可靠性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 May;20(3):173-84.
7
Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children?加的夫视力测试在检测儿童屈光不正方面有效吗?
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):577-81. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000230268.99107.15.
8
Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.电脑化对数最小分辨角视力测量系统(COMPlog)的验证:与成人及弱视儿童的ETDRS和电子ETDRS测试算法的比较
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;92(2):241-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.121715. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
9
[DIN-compatible vision assessment of increased reproducibility using staircase measurement and maximum likelihood analysis].[使用阶梯测量和最大似然分析对提高可重复性的DIN兼容视力评估]
Ophthalmologe. 1996 Aug;93(4):328-32.
10
[Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].[使用Landolt-C视力表和ETDRS视力表测量健康受试者及各种眼病患者视力的比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011 Oct;228(10):864-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281758. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural contrast sensitivity is not affected by myopic blur.神经对比敏感度不受近视性模糊的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15911-y.
2
Update on Clinical Trial Endpoints in Gene Therapy Trials for Inherited Retinal Diseases.遗传性视网膜疾病基因治疗试验的临床试验终点更新
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 18;13(18):5512. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185512.
3
tRNS boosts visual perceptual learning in participants with bilateral macular degeneration.经颅随机噪声刺激可提高双侧黄斑变性患者的视觉感知学习能力。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Feb 21;16:1326435. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1326435. eCollection 2024.
4
The effects of type and workload of internal tasks on voluntary saccades in a target-distractor saccade task.在目标-干扰眼跳任务中,内部任务的类型和工作量对自愿眼跳的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0290322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290322. eCollection 2023.
5
Effects of internally directed cognition on smooth pursuit eye movements: A systematic examination of perceptual decoupling.内指向认知对平滑追踪眼球运动的影响:对知觉解耦的系统考察。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1159-1178. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02688-3. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
Visual masking deficits in schizophrenia: a view into the genetics of the disease through an endophenotype.精神分裂症的视觉掩蔽缺陷:通过内表型窥探疾病的遗传学。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 31;12(1):529. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02275-4.
7
Deficits in multiple object-tracking and visual attention following mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤后多项物体追踪和视觉注意力的缺陷。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 12;12(1):13727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18163-2.
8
Quantification of the Dynamic Visual Acuity Space at Real-World Luminances and Contrasts: The VA-CAL Test.在真实世界亮度和对比度下动态视力空间的量化:VA-CAL测试。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.4.12.
9
Beyond the tracked line of sight - Evaluation of the peripheral usable field of view in a simulator setting.超越跟踪视线范围——模拟器环境下周边可用视野的评估
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Apr 26;12(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.3.9.
10
Effects of practice on visuo-spatial attention in a wayfinding task.练习对寻路任务中视空间注意力的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):2900-2910. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01463-5. Epub 2021 Jan 20.