Humes Larry E, Wilson Dana L, Humes Lauren, Barlow Nancy N, Garner Carolyn B, Amos Nathan
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana Univesity, Bloomington 47405-7002, USA.
Ear Hear. 2002 Oct;23(5):422-7. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200210000-00004.
The objective of this study was to compare the results of two measures of hearing aid satisfaction, an indirect measure (Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living, SADL; Cox & Alexander, 1999) and a direct measure (an expanded version of the MarkeTrak-IV survey; Kochkin, 1996), in a group of elderly hearing aid wearers.
A total of 43 elderly hearing aid wearers completed both satisfaction measures (order counterbalanced across wearers) after 1 mo of wearing 2-channel wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) in-the-canal (ITC) hearing aids. A correlational research design was employed.
The elderly hearing aid wearers in this study yielded results on each measure of hearing aid satisfaction that were generally consistent with those found previously in larger groups of similar samples. The correlation between each measure of satisfaction (r = 0.75) was positive, moderately strong, and significant (p < 0.01) for the global scores of the SADL and MarkeTrak-IV scales.
Although different approaches to the measurement of satisfaction were followed in the development of the SADL (indirect approach) and the MarkeTrak-IV (direct measurement) scales, similar results were obtained with each scale. The 15-item SADL instrument, however, is much shorter than the MarkeTrak-IV instrument and, as a result, is more efficient to administer clinically.
本研究的目的是比较两种助听器满意度测量方法的结果,一种是间接测量方法(日常生活中对放大效果的满意度,SADL;考克斯和亚历山大,1999年),另一种是直接测量方法(MarkeTrak-IV调查的扩展版本;科奇金,1996年),对象为一组老年助听器佩戴者。
共有43名老年助听器佩戴者在佩戴两通道宽动态范围压缩(WDRC)耳道式(ITC)助听器1个月后完成了两种满意度测量(测量顺序在佩戴者之间进行了平衡)。采用相关研究设计。
本研究中的老年助听器佩戴者在每种助听器满意度测量方法上得出的结果,总体上与之前在更大规模类似样本组中发现的结果一致。对于SADL和MarkeTrak-IV量表的总体得分,每种满意度测量方法之间的相关性(r = 0.75)为正,中等强度且具有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。
尽管在SADL量表(间接方法)和MarkeTrak-IV量表(直接测量)的开发过程中采用了不同的满意度测量方法,但每个量表都获得了相似的结果。然而,15项的SADL工具比MarkeTrak-IV工具短得多,因此在临床应用中管理起来更高效。