《中文版日常生活听力放大满意度的信效度分析》

[Analysis of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life].

作者信息

Li Y L, Zhang H, Fu X X, Yang J Y, Chen X J, Qi B E

机构信息

Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100005,China.

出版信息

Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 20;31(20):1554-1557. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.20.003.

DOI:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.20.003

PMID:29797948

Abstract

To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL).Ninety adult hearing aid users were evaluated with Chinese version of the SADL.①Reliability:Cronbach's α score of overall SADL score was 0.814 and the four subdomains were 0.543-0.824. ②Validity: The correlation coefficients between overall SADL score and the four subdomains were 0.514-0.826(all <0.01).There were weak or no correlations among the four subdomains. The evaluation of content validity by expertreview showed the questionnaire had good content validity. SADL total scores in bilateral hearing aid userswere significantly higher than those in unilateral hearing aid users (=2.192,<0.05).The Chinese version of the SADL meets many psychometric criteria of a robust instrument. It possesses appropriate validity and good reliability, and can be used to measure the outcome for adult hearing aid users in China.

摘要

目的

探讨中文版日常生活助听满意度量表（SADL）的信度和效度。对90名成年助听器使用者进行中文版SADL评估。①信度：SADL总分的Cronbach's α系数为0.814，四个子领域为0.543 - 0.824。②效度：SADL总分与四个子领域的相关系数为0.514 - 0.826（均<0.01）。四个子领域之间相关性较弱或无相关性。专家评审的内容效度评估表明该问卷具有良好的内容效度。双侧助听器使用者的SADL总分显著高于单侧助听器使用者（=2.192，<0.05）。中文版SADL符合可靠工具的多项心理测量标准。它具有适当的效度和良好的信度，可用于评估中国成年助听器使用者的情况。