Wang Quanyi, Ross Michael W
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing.
AIDS Educ Prev. 2002 Oct;14(5):361-6. doi: 10.1521/aeap.14.6.361.24081.
In a study to determine sampling differences between Internet sites, we obtained data on 353 men who have sex with men in Chinese gay chat rooms and through e-mail web sites. Respondents were approached by the investigator and agreed to fill out an anonymous questionnaire on their Internet use and sexual activity. All materials and contacts were in Chinese characters. Data indicated that there were few differences between the chat room and Internet samples, but that those using e-mail appear to be more isolated, more homosexually-identified (rather than bisexual), have more experience with casual partners on a number of sexual activities, and were less likely to carry condoms and to have safe sex. E-mail respondents were more likely to want to discuss HIV/AIDS prevention on a web site or other site. These data suggest that the two recruiting methods are largely comparable in respondent characteristics, but that e-mail respondents are likely to be more isolated and at higher HIV risk than chat room participants.
在一项旨在确定不同互联网平台抽样差异的研究中,我们收集了353名男同性恋者的数据,这些数据来自中国的同性恋聊天室和电子邮件网站。研究者与受访者取得联系,他们同意填写一份关于其互联网使用情况和性活动的匿名问卷。所有材料和联系方式均为中文。数据表明,聊天室样本和互联网样本之间差异不大,但使用电子邮件的人似乎更加孤立,更倾向于认定自己为同性恋(而非双性恋),在多种性活动中与临时伴侣的经历更多,而且携带避孕套并进行安全性行为的可能性较小。通过电子邮件参与调查的人更希望在网站或其他平台上讨论艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防问题。这些数据表明,这两种招募方法在受访者特征方面大致相当,但通过电子邮件参与调查的人可能比聊天室参与者更加孤立,感染艾滋病毒的风险更高。