Clifford Tammy J, Campbell M Karen, Speechley Kathy N, Gorodzinsky Fabian
Department of Epidemiology, The University of Western Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Nov;156(11):1123-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.11.1123.
The etiology of infant colic remains unknown, despite an abundance of research on the topic.
To determine whether breastfeeding has a protective effect in colic's development.
A prospective cohort study of 856 mother-infant dyads. Eligible participants included English-speaking adult residents of a region in Ontario, who gave birth, at term, to a live singleton whose birth weight was appropriate for gestational age. Self-administered questionnaires, mailed to mothers at 1 and 6 weeks post partum, requested information on several infant and maternal factors, including source of infant nutrition (exclusively breastfed, complementary fed, and exclusively formula fed). Cases of colic were identified by applying modified Wessel criteria to data recorded in the Barr Baby Day Diary or by interpreting responses to the Ames Cry Score.
Prevalence of colic among breastfed, formula-fed, and complementary-fed infants; and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) reflecting the prevalence of colic among formula- and complementary-fed infants relative to those who were breastfed.
Of 856 mothers, 733 (86%) completed the first questionnaire and 617 (72%) completed the second questionnaire. Overall, the prevalence of colic at 6 weeks was 24%. No association was seen between the source of infant nutrition and colic's development. In multivariate analyses, higher levels of maternal trait anxiety (AOR, 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.54), maternal alcohol consumption at 6 weeks (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03-2.40), and shift work during pregnancy (AOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.73-2.21) were associated with an increased likelihood of colic, after controlling for feeding method, maternal age, and parity. In these same analyses, being married or having a common-law partner (AOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.87) and being employed full-time during pregnancy (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32-1.14) were associated with a reduced likelihood of colic.
Breastfeeding did not have a protective effect on the development of colic. Although colic was statistically associated with several variables, including preexisting maternal anxiety, much of colic's etiology remains unexplained.
尽管对婴儿腹绞痛这一主题进行了大量研究,但其病因仍不明确。
确定母乳喂养对腹绞痛的发生是否具有保护作用。
一项对856对母婴进行的前瞻性队列研究。符合条件的参与者包括安大略省某地区讲英语的成年居民,她们足月分娩出单胎活产婴儿,且出生体重与孕周相符。在产后1周和6周向母亲邮寄自填式问卷,询问有关几个婴儿和母亲因素的信息,包括婴儿营养来源(纯母乳喂养、混合喂养和纯配方奶喂养)。通过将改良的韦塞尔标准应用于巴尔婴儿日记中记录的数据或解读对艾姆斯哭声评分的回答来确定腹绞痛病例。
母乳喂养、配方奶喂养和混合喂养婴儿中腹绞痛的患病率;以及调整后的优势比(AOR),反映配方奶喂养和混合喂养婴儿相对于母乳喂养婴儿腹绞痛的患病率。
856名母亲中,733名(86%)完成了第一份问卷,617名(72%)完成了第二份问卷。总体而言,6周时腹绞痛的患病率为24%。未发现婴儿营养来源与腹绞痛的发生之间存在关联。在多变量分析中,在控制喂养方式、母亲年龄和产次后,母亲特质焦虑水平较高(AOR,1.22;95%置信区间[CI],0.96 - 1.54)、产后6周母亲饮酒(AOR,1.57;95%CI,1.03 - 2.40)以及孕期轮班工作(AOR,1.27;95%CI,0.73 - 2.21)与腹绞痛发生的可能性增加有关。在相同分析中,已婚或有同居伴侣(AOR,0.30;95%CI,0.10 - 0.87)以及孕期全职工作(AOR,0.60;95%CI,0.32 - 1.14)与腹绞痛发生的可能性降低有关。
母乳喂养对腹绞痛的发生没有保护作用。尽管腹绞痛在统计学上与几个变量相关,包括母亲原有的焦虑,但腹绞痛的许多病因仍无法解释。