• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人行横道标线与老年行人发生行人-机动车碰撞事故的风险

Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians.

作者信息

Koepsell Thomas, McCloskey Lon, Wolf Marsha, Moudon Anne Vernez, Buchner David, Kraus Jess, Patterson Matthew

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Box 357236, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2002 Nov 6;288(17):2136-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.17.2136.

DOI:10.1001/jama.288.17.2136
PMID:12413373
Abstract

CONTEXT

Motor vehicles struck and killed 4739 pedestrians in the United States in the year 2000. Older pedestrians are at especially high risk.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether crosswalk markings at urban intersections influence the risk of injury to older pedestrians.

DESIGN

Case-control study in which the units of study were crossing locations.

SETTING

Six cities in Washington and California, with case accrual from February 1995 through January 1999.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 282 case sites were street-crossing locations at an intersection where a pedestrian aged 65 years or older had been struck by a motor vehicle while crossing the street; 564 control sites were other nearby crossings that were matched to case sites based on street classification. Trained observers recorded environmental characteristics, vehicular traffic flow and speed, and pedestrian use at each site on the same day of the week and time of day as when the case event had occurred.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collision involving an older pedestrian.

RESULTS

After adjusting for pedestrian flow, vehicle flow, crossing length, and signalization, risk of a pedestrian-motor vehicle collision was 2.1-fold greater (95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.0) at sites with a marked crosswalk. Almost all of the excess risk was due to 3.6-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.7-7.9) higher risk associated with marked crosswalks at sites with no traffic signal or stop sign.

CONCLUSIONS

Crosswalk markings appear associated with increased risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collision to older pedestrians at sites where no signal or stop sign is present to halt traffic.

摘要

背景

2000年在美国有4739名行人被机动车撞死。老年行人面临的风险尤其高。

目的

确定城市十字路口的人行横道标记是否会影响老年行人受伤的风险。

设计

以交叉地点为研究单位的病例对照研究。

地点

华盛顿州和加利福尼亚州的六个城市,病例收集时间为1995年2月至1999年1月。

参与者

共有282个病例地点是十字路口的人行横道位置,在这些地点有65岁及以上的行人在过马路时被机动车撞到;564个对照地点是附近其他的十字路口,根据街道分类与病例地点相匹配。训练有素的观察员在与病例事件发生当天相同的一周中的日期和时间记录每个地点的环境特征、车辆交通流量和速度以及行人使用情况。

主要结局指标

涉及老年行人的行人与机动车碰撞风险。

结果

在对行人流量、车辆流量、人行横道长度和信号设置进行调整后,有标记人行横道的地点发生行人与机动车碰撞的风险高出2.1倍(95%置信区间,1.1 - 4.0)。几乎所有额外风险都归因于在没有交通信号灯或停车标志的地点,有标记人行横道的相关风险高出3.6倍(95%置信区间,1.7 - 7.9)。

结论

在没有信号或停车标志来阻止交通的地点,人行横道标记似乎与老年行人发生行人与机动车碰撞的风险增加有关。

相似文献

1
Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians.人行横道标线与老年行人发生行人-机动车碰撞事故的风险
JAMA. 2002 Nov 6;288(17):2136-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.17.2136.
2
Multilevel models for evaluating the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions at intersections and mid-blocks.用于评估十字路口和街区中部行人与机动车碰撞风险的多层次模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Nov;84:99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Pedestrian signalization and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in Lima, Peru.秘鲁利马的行人信号与行人和机动车碰撞风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Sep;70:273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 10.
4
Bus stops and pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in Lima, Peru: a matched case-control study.秘鲁利马的公交站点与行人-机动车碰撞事故:一项配对病例对照研究。
Inj Prev. 2015 Apr;21(e1):e15-22. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041023. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
5
Evaluating the effectiveness of new-designed crosswalk markings at intersections in China considering vehicle-pedestrian interaction.评估考虑车-人交互的中国新型交叉口横道线设计的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May;139:105498. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105498. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
6
A novel framework to evaluate pedestrian safety at non-signalized locations.一种评估无信号控制区域行人安全的新框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Feb;111:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.015.
7
The risk of pedestrian injury and fatality in collisions with motor vehicles, a social ecological study of state routes and city streets in King County, Washington.与机动车碰撞致行人受伤和死亡的风险:华盛顿州金县州级道路和城市街道的社会生态学研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
8
Left-turning vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at signalized intersections with traffic lights: Benefit or harm? A two-stage study.设有交通信号灯的交叉路口处左转车辆与行人的冲突:是利还是弊?一项分两阶段的研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Apr;22(2):63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.07.007. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
9
A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas.一种用于促进城市地区安全行人过街的新型行人过街服务水平(PCLOS)方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;18(16):8813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168813.
10
The influence of signs prompting motorists to yield before marked crosswalks on motor vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at crosswalks with flashing amber.提示驾驶者在有闪烁琥珀色信号灯的标记人行横道前让行的标志对人行横道处机动车与行人冲突的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 1992 Jun;24(3):217-25. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(92)90001-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Design of a Location-Based Case-Control Study of Built Environment Risk Factors for Pedestrian Fatalities in the U.S.美国行人死亡事故中建筑环境风险因素的基于地点的病例对照研究设计
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 11;194(7):1976-83. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae377.
2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
The Influence of Built Environment Factors on Elderly Pedestrian Road Safety in Cities: The Experience of Madrid.
城市建成环境因素对老年人步行道路安全的影响:马德里的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042280.
4
Expanding Tools for Investigating Neighborhood Indicators of Drug Use and Violence: Validation of the NIfETy for Virtual Street Observation.扩展用于调查毒品使用和暴力的社区指标的工具:虚拟街道观察的 NIfETy 验证。
Prev Sci. 2020 Feb;21(2):203-210. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01062-w.
5
Older Adults' Expectations about Mortality, Driving Life and Years Left without Driving.老年人对死亡率、驾驶年限和无驾驶剩余年限的期望。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2019 Oct;62(8):912-929. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2019.1663460. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Alcohol outlets and firearm violence: a place-based case-control study using satellite imagery and machine learning.酒精销售点与枪支暴力:基于地点的病例对照研究,采用卫星图像和机器学习。
Inj Prev. 2020 Feb;26(1):61-66. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043248. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
Factors related to road system organisation and its association with mortality due to motor vehicle-pedestrian collisions in Guadalajara Metropolitan Area.与道路系统组织相关的因素及其与瓜达拉哈拉大都市区机动车-行人碰撞死亡率的关系。
Inj Prev. 2020 Jun;26(3):270-278. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043153. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
8
Novel Methods for Environmental Assessment of Pedestrian Injury: Creation and Validation of the Inventory for Pedestrian Safety Infrastructure.行人伤害环境评估的新方法:行人安全基础设施清单的编制和验证。
J Urban Health. 2018 Apr;95(2):208-221. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0226-2.
9
Gender and age differences in components of traffic-related pedestrian death rates: exposure, risk of crash and fatality rate.与交通相关的行人死亡率各组成部分中的性别和年龄差异:暴露情况、撞车风险和死亡率。
Inj Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;3(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40621-016-0079-2. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
10
Use of Google Street View to Assess Environmental Contributions to Pedestrian Injury.利用谷歌街景视图评估环境对行人受伤的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Mar;106(3):462-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302978. Epub 2016 Jan 21.