Clark Jeff A, Lieh-Lai Mary W, Sarnaik Ashok, Mattoo Tej K
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201-2196, USA.
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):920-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.920.
The current recommendation for choosing an appropriate size cuff for measuring blood pressure (BP) is a bladder width to equal 40% of the upper arm circumference (UAC). However, most physicians use the older two-thirds or three-fourths upper arm length (UAL) recommendations to choose a cuff. The aim of this study was to verify the disparity in cuff size by using two-thirds UAL, three-fourths UAL, and 40% UAC criteria for cuff selection and to compare the indirectly measured BP by these criteria with directly measured radial intra-arterial BP.
A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in 65 hemodynamically stable patients, aged 5 days to 22 years. Direct BP measurements were obtained from a radial intra-arterial catheter. Indirect BP measurements were taken from the same arm as the arterial catheter with a mercury sphygmomanometer and standard-size arm cuffs. UAL and UAC of each patient were measured, and the 3 cuffs closest to two-thirds and three-fourths UAL and 40% UAC were used. For each cuff, 3 direct and 3 indirect BP measurements were taken. Student t test was used to compare mean systolic and diastolic BP for direct and indirect measurements.
A total of 172 observations were recorded, including 56 by two-thirds UAL, 55 by three-fourths UAL, and 61 by 40% UAC criteria. There was no significant difference between the means of the ideal cuff size by 40% UAC criterion and the actual cuffs used from the available standard cuffs. However, because of an unavailability of the larger cuffs for UAL criteria, the actual cuffs used were significantly smaller than ideal. Comparison of direct and indirect BP measurements revealed no significant difference in systolic BP when the latter was obtained by 40% UAC criterion. However, the difference in diastolic BP was significant. With available cuffs, a significant difference in systolic as well as diastolic BP was seen with both UAL criteria.
Practitioners are likely to use significantly larger arm cuffs when following the two-thirds and three-fourths UAL criteria than when following the 40% UAC criterion. Of the 3 criteria for cuff selection, systolic BP by 40% UAC criterion most accurately reflects directly measured radial arterial pressure. However, the 40% UAC cuff significantly overestimates the diastolic pressure. Using available cuffs for indirect measurements by two-thirds and three-quarters UAL criteria significantly underestimates systolic as well as diastolic BP when compared with radial intra-arterial BP.
目前关于选择合适尺寸袖带测量血压(BP)的建议是,气囊宽度应等于上臂周长(UAC)的40%。然而,大多数医生使用较旧的上臂长度(UAL)的三分之二或四分之三的建议来选择袖带。本研究的目的是通过使用UAL的三分之二、四分之三以及UAC的40%标准来选择袖带,验证袖带尺寸的差异,并将这些标准间接测量的血压与直接测量的桡动脉内血压进行比较。
对65例年龄在5天至22岁、血流动力学稳定的患者进行了一项前瞻性、横断面观察性研究。直接血压测量通过桡动脉内导管获得。间接血压测量使用汞柱式血压计和标准尺寸的手臂袖带,在与动脉导管相同的手臂上进行。测量每位患者的UAL和UAC,并使用最接近UAL的三分之二、四分之三以及UAC的40%的3个袖带。对于每个袖带,进行3次直接和3次间接血压测量。采用学生t检验比较直接和间接测量的平均收缩压和舒张压。
共记录了172次观察结果,其中根据UAL的三分之二标准进行测量的有56次,根据四分之三标准的有55次,根据UAC的40%标准的有61次。根据UAC的40%标准得出的理想袖带尺寸均值与从现有标准袖带中实际使用的袖带之间无显著差异。然而,由于根据UAL标准无法获得更大尺寸的袖带,实际使用的袖带明显小于理想尺寸。直接和间接血压测量的比较显示,当根据UAC的40%标准获得间接血压测量值时,收缩压无显著差异。然而,舒张压差异显著。使用现有袖带时,两种UAL标准在收缩压和舒张压方面均存在显著差异。
与遵循UAC的40%标准相比,医生在遵循UAL的三分之二和四分之三标准时可能会使用明显更大尺寸的手臂袖带。在三种袖带选择标准中,根据UAC的40%标准测量的收缩压最准确地反映了直接测量的桡动脉压力。然而,根据UAC的40%标准的袖带显著高估了舒张压。与桡动脉内血压相比,使用现有袖带根据UAL的三分之二和四分之三标准进行间接测量时,显著低估了收缩压和舒张压。