Russell A E, Wing L M, Smith S A, Aylward P E, McRitchie R J, Hassam R M, West M J, Chalmers J P
Department of Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia.
J Hypertens. 1989 Aug;7(8):607-13. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198908000-00002.
This study tested the hypothesis that a sphygmomanometer cuff bladder long enough to encircle the arm in most adults ('obese cuff') would provide a more accurate and precise estimate of intra-arterial pressure than the usual 'standard' cuff bladder. In 53 patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography (35 males, 18 females, aged 36-79 years), indirect blood pressure, measured in the left arm with a random-zero sphygmomanometer, was compared with simultaneously measured femoral intra-arterial pressure. Duplicate indirect measurements were made with each of two cuffs containing bladders measuring 39 x 15 cm ('obese') and 23 x 12 cm ('standard'). The obese cuff bladder encircled 80% or more of the arm circumference in all subjects, whereas the standard cuff bladder met this requirement in only 19% of the subjects. For both systolic and diastolic pressure there was marked interindividual variability in the differences between indirect and direct measurements with both cuffs. With the obese cuff there was no systematic error in the diastolic blood pressure measurement. The standard cuff consistently overestimated diastolic pressure by 7.7 +/- 8.3 mmHg (mean +/- s.d.). For both cuffs, the difference between indirect and direct diastolic pressure increased with arm size (P less than 0.05). Both cuffs underestimated systolic blood pressure, the obese cuff by 15.5 +/- 11.7 mmHg and the standard cuff by 7.6 +/- 12.1 mmHg. These systolic blood pressure underestimates were greater at higher blood pressures (P less than 0.01) and with smaller arms (P less than 0.05). Age was not related to measurement error with either cuff.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对于大多数成年人而言,一种袖带气囊足够长以环绕手臂的血压计(“肥胖者袖带”)比常用的“标准”袖带气囊能更准确精确地估计动脉内压力。在53例接受诊断性冠状动脉造影的患者(35例男性,18例女性,年龄36 - 79岁)中,用随机零点血压计在左臂测量的间接血压与同时测量的股动脉内压力进行比较。使用两个袖带分别进行重复间接测量,这两个袖带的气囊尺寸分别为39×15厘米(“肥胖者用”)和23×12厘米(“标准用”)。肥胖者袖带气囊在所有受试者中环绕了80%或更多的手臂周长,而标准袖带气囊仅在19%的受试者中满足这一要求。对于收缩压和舒张压,两种袖带的间接测量与直接测量之间的差异在个体间均存在显著变异性。使用肥胖者袖带时,舒张压测量无系统误差。标准袖带始终高估舒张压7.7±8.3毫米汞柱(均值±标准差)。对于两种袖带,间接与直接舒张压之间的差异随手臂尺寸增加而增大(P<0.05)。两种袖带均低估收缩压,肥胖者袖带低估15.5±11.7毫米汞柱,标准袖带低估7.6±12.1毫米汞柱。这些收缩压低估在血压较高时(P<0.01)和手臂较小时(P<0.05)更为明显。年龄与两种袖带的测量误差均无关。(摘要截短于250字)