Rockwood Kenneth
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5955 Jubilee Road, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2E1.
J Neurol Sci. 2002 Nov 15;203-204:23-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00255-1.
The criteria for vascular dementia (VaD) depend on first diagnosing dementia using Alzheimer-type criteria, upon which are superimposed vascular events, usually following a stroke model. This if often inappropriate, however, as memory loss is not always prominent in VaD. Alzheimer-type criteria will not detect these patients, and much brain injury can occur without resulting in classical features of stroke. VaD is often only diagnosed when dementia is clinically manifest, already too late to influence the early progression of the disease. Moreover, the predominating consensus-based criteria have demonstrably poor reliability. These shortcomings in the diagnosis of VaD have led to the development of the concept of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), a broader term that is intended to detect cognitive loss before the dementia advances beyond effective treatment. Criteria for VCI are in the early stages of development. A lack of data on the beginnings of cognitive loss has inhibited their formalization, but it appears that the level of cognition should be set at a sensitive rather than a specific level. Similarly, for routine purposes, neuroimaging evidence of any cerebrovascular disease may be sufficient to document VCI and specific localization is not required. The current clinical criteria for VaD are probably not applicable for the diagnosis of VCI since the presence of focal signs is inappropriate, and stepwise progression is more supportive than diagnostic of VCI. The purpose of defining the new concept of VCI is to identify preventable risk factors. Importantly, not only physical health but also mental health should be monitored and treated.
血管性痴呆(VaD)的诊断标准首先依赖于使用阿尔茨海默病类型的标准来诊断痴呆症,在此基础上叠加血管事件,通常遵循中风模型。然而,这往往并不合适,因为记忆丧失在VaD中并不总是突出表现。阿尔茨海默病类型的标准无法检测出这些患者,而且在没有导致中风典型特征的情况下,大脑可能会发生很多损伤。VaD往往只有在痴呆症临床表现出来时才被诊断出来,此时对疾病早期进展进行干预已经为时过晚。此外,基于共识的主流标准的可靠性明显较差。VaD诊断中的这些缺陷导致了血管性认知障碍(VCI)概念的发展,这是一个更宽泛的术语,旨在在痴呆症发展到超出有效治疗阶段之前检测出认知丧失。VCI的标准正处于发展的早期阶段。缺乏关于认知丧失起始阶段的数据阻碍了其规范化,但似乎认知水平应设定在一个敏感而非特异的水平。同样,出于常规目的,任何脑血管疾病的神经影像学证据可能足以记录VCI,并不需要特定的定位。目前VaD的临床标准可能不适用于VCI的诊断,因为局灶性体征的存在并不合适,且逐步进展对VCI来说更具支持性而非诊断性。定义VCI新概念的目的是识别可预防的风险因素。重要的是,不仅身体健康,心理健康也应受到监测和治疗。