Potter Mary C, Staub Adrian, O'Connor Daniel H
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1149-62. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.5.1149.
Competition for attention between 2 written words was investigated by presenting the words briefly in a single stream of distractors (Experiment 1) or in different streams (Experiment 2-6), using rapid serial visual presentation at 53 ms/item. Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was varied from 0 to 213 ms. At all SOAs there was strong competition, but which word was more likely to be reported shifted markedly with SOA. At SOAs in the range of 13-53 ms the second word was more likely to be reported, but at 213 ms, the advantage switched to the first word, as in the attentional blink. A 2-stage competition model of attention is proposed in which attention to a detected target is labile in Stage 1. Stage 1 ends when one target is identified, initiating a serial Stage 2 process of consolidation of that target.
通过在单个干扰项流中短暂呈现单词(实验1)或在不同流中呈现单词(实验2 - 6),使用53毫秒/项目的快速序列视觉呈现,研究了两个书面单词之间对注意力的竞争。刺激起始异步(SOA)从0变化到213毫秒。在所有SOA下都存在强烈竞争,但哪个单词更有可能被报告随着SOA显著变化。在13 - 53毫秒范围内的SOA时,第二个单词更有可能被报告,但在213毫秒时,优势转向第一个单词,如同注意瞬脱现象。提出了一个两阶段注意力竞争模型,其中在第一阶段对检测到的目标的注意力是不稳定的。当识别出一个目标时,第一阶段结束,启动对该目标进行巩固的串行第二阶段过程。