Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not--Part 2: scalability.
作者信息
Benson Tim
机构信息
Abies Ltd, 24 Carlingford Road, London NW3 1RX.
出版信息
BMJ. 2002 Nov 9;325(7372):1090-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7372.1090.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not--Part 2: scalability.为什么全科医生使用电脑而医院医生不使用——第二部分：可扩展性。
BMJ. 2002 Nov 9;325(7372):1090-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7372.1090.
2
Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not--Part 1: incentives.为何全科医生使用计算机而医院医生不使用——第一部分：激励因素
BMJ. 2002 Nov 9;325(7372):1086-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7372.1086.
3
Data security: keeping a lid on Pandora's box.数据安全：控制住潘多拉魔盒
Health Estate. 2008 May;62(5):51-6.
4
Why British GPs use computers and hospital doctors do not.为何英国的全科医生使用电脑而医院医生不使用。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:42-6.
5
6
What are the Read Codes?什么是读码？
Health Libr Rev. 1994 Sep;11(3):177-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.1994.1130177.x.
7
National Health Service's I/S network takes shape.国民医疗服务体系的信息系统网络初具雏形。
Health Manag Technol. 1995 Jan;16(1):34, 36.
8
Reflecting on change.反思变化。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2006 May;13(2):12-7.
9
Medical Record Abstracting System/Information Delivery System (MRAS/IDS).病历摘要系统/信息传递系统（MRAS/IDS）。
Health Inf Manag. 1994 Dec;24(4):153-5. doi: 10.1177/183335839402400414.
10
A study on an information security system of a regional collaborative medical platform.区域性协同医疗平台信息安全系统研究
Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(6):746-50. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0001.
引用本文的文献
1
Coordinating the Medical Division of Labour: The Travails of Electronic Patient Records in the United Kingdom and United States.协调医疗分工：英国和美国电子病历的艰难历程
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Sep;47(7):e70085. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70085.
2
Measure what we want: a taxonomy of short generic person-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs).衡量我们想要的：简短通用的患者报告结局和体验测量指标（PROMs和PREMs）分类法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Mar;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000789.
3
Identifying patients with chronic widespread pain in primary care.在初级保健中识别患有慢性广泛性疼痛的患者。
Pain. 2017 Jan;158(1):110-119. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000733.
4
Critical theory as an approach to the ethics of information security.作为一种信息安全伦理研究方法的批判理论。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Sep;20(3):675-99. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9496-6. Epub 2013 Nov 30.
5
National-scale clinical information exchange in the United Kingdom: lessons for the United States.英国全国范围内的临床信息交流：对美国的启示。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):91-8. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005611. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
6
Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts.实施英国国家医疗服务体系信息技术项目：对急症信托进展情况的定性研究
BMJ. 2007 Jun 30;334(7608):1360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39195.598461.551. Epub 2007 May 17.
7
From the front line, report from a near paperless hospital: mixed reception among health care professionals.来自前线，一家近乎无纸化医院的报告：医护人员反应不一。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):668-75. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2108. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
8
Notifiable disease surveillance and practicing physicians.法定传染病监测与执业医师。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Mar;11(3):442-5. doi: 10.3201/eid1103.040361.
9
The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.基层医疗中记录保存的质量：计算机化系统、纸质系统和混合系统的比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Dec;53(497):929-33; discussion 933.
10
Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice.扫描和消除纸质病历对医院医生临床工作实践的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):588-95. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1337. Epub 2003 Aug 4.
本文引用的文献
1
How the past teaches the future: ACMI distinguished lecture.往昔如何启迪未来：ACMI杰出讲座
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):222-34. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080222.
2
The anatomy of a clinical information system.临床信息系统剖析
BMJ. 1998 May 30;316(7145):1655-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7145.1655.
3
Why industry is not embracing standards.为何行业不接受标准。
Int J Med Inform. 1998 Feb;48(1-3):133-6. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00118-4.
4
Medical records that guide and teach.具有指导和教学作用的医疗记录。
N Engl J Med. 1968 Mar 14;278(11):593-600. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196803142781105.
5
The Read clinical classification.里德临床分类法。
BMJ. 1990 Apr 28;300(6732):1092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6732.1092.
Zotero 插件