Krause Gérard, Ropers Gwendolin, Stark Klaus
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Seetrasse 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Mar;11(3):442-5. doi: 10.3201/eid1103.040361.
Primary care physicians in Germany are essential participants in infectious disease surveillance through mandatory reporting. Feedback on such surveillance should reflect the needs and attitudes of these physicians. These issues were investigated in a questionnaire survey among 8,550 randomly sampled physicians in Germany in 2001. Of the 1,320 respondents, 59.3% claimed not to have received any feedback on infectious disease surveillance, and 3.7% perceived feedback as not important. Logistic regression analysis showed that physicians in the former East Germany were 2.2 times more likely to have received feedback than those in the former West Germany. Physicians preferred to receive occasional reports (e.g., in case of outbreaks, 31.6%) as opposed to actively having to search for constantly updated information on the Internet (7.8%). The preferred formats were fax (31.7%), mail (30.9%), and the official organ of the German Medical Association (Deutsches Arzteblatt) (30.5%). Feedback of surveillance data to physicians should be delivered through occasional nonelectronic reports on current issues of local public health importance.
德国的初级保健医生通过强制报告成为传染病监测的重要参与者。此类监测的反馈应反映这些医生的需求和态度。2001年,针对德国8550名随机抽样的医生进行了问卷调查,对这些问题展开了调查。在1320名受访者中,59.3%称未收到任何关于传染病监测的反馈,3.7%认为反馈不重要。逻辑回归分析显示,前东德的医生收到反馈的可能性是前西德医生的2.2倍。医生们更喜欢偶尔收到报告(如在疫情爆发时,占31.6%),而不是必须主动在互联网上搜索不断更新的信息(占7.8%)。首选的形式是传真(占31.7%)、邮件(占30.9%)以及德国医学协会的官方刊物《德国医学周报》(占30.5%)。应通过偶尔发布的关于当地公共卫生重要问题的非电子报告,向医生提供监测数据反馈。