Laerum Hallvard, Karlsen Tom H, Faxvaag Arild
INM, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):588-95. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1337. Epub 2003 Aug 4.
It is not automatically given that the paper-based medical record can be eliminated after the introduction of an electronic medical record (EMR) in a hospital. Many keep and update the paper-based counterpart, and this limits the use of the EMR system. The authors have evaluated the physicians' clinical work practices and attitudes toward a system in a hospital that has eliminated the paper-based counterpart using scanning technology.
Combined open-ended interviews (8 physicians) and cross-sectional survey (70 physicians) were conducted and compared with reference data from a previous national survey (69 physicians from six hospitals). The hospitals in the reference group were using the same EMR system without the scanning module.
The questionnaire (English translation available as an online data supplement at <www.jamia.org>) covered frequency of use of the EMR system for 19 defined tasks, ease of performing them, and user satisfaction. The interviews were open-ended.
The physicians routinely used the system for nine of 11 tasks regarding retrieval of patient data, which the majority of the physicians found more easily performed than before. However, 22% to 25% of the physicians found retrieval of patient data more difficult, particularly among internists (33%). Overall, the physicians were equally satisfied with the part of the system handling the regular electronic data as that of the physicians in the reference group. They were, however, much less satisfied with the use of scanned document images than that of regular electronic data, using the former less frequently than the latter.
Scanning and elimination of the paper-based medical record is feasible, but the scanned document images should be considered an intermediate stage toward fully electronic medical records. To our knowledge, this is the first assessment from a hospital in the process of completing such a scanning project.
在医院引入电子病历(EMR)后,纸质病历并非会自动被淘汰。许多医院仍保留并更新纸质病历,这限制了EMR系统的使用。作者评估了一家使用扫描技术淘汰了纸质病历的医院中医生的临床工作实践以及他们对该系统的态度。
开展了开放式访谈(8名医生)和横断面调查(70名医生),并与之前一项全国性调查(来自六家医院的69名医生)的参考数据进行比较。参考组中的医院使用的是相同的EMR系统,但没有扫描模块。
问卷(英文版本可在<www.jamia.org>作为在线数据补充获取)涵盖了EMR系统用于19项规定任务的使用频率、执行这些任务的难易程度以及用户满意度。访谈为开放式。
在11项与检索患者数据相关的任务中,医生常规使用该系统完成其中9项,大多数医生认为这些任务比以前更容易执行。然而,22%至25%的医生发现检索患者数据更困难,尤其是内科医生(33%)。总体而言,医生对系统处理常规电子数据部分的满意度与参考组医生相同。然而,他们对扫描文档图像的使用满意度远低于常规电子数据,使用前者的频率低于后者。
扫描并淘汰纸质病历是可行的,但扫描文档图像应被视为迈向完全电子化病历的一个中间阶段。据我们所知,这是来自一家正在完成此类扫描项目的医院的首次评估。