Ardila Alfredo
Florida International University, Miami, USA.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2002 Sep;12(3):127-30; discussion 135, 137, 139-41. doi: 10.1023/a:1020370728584.
Two training models in neuropsychology have been recently proposed (Guidelines of the INS-Division 40 Task Force on Education, Accreditation, and Credentialing, Clin. Neuropsychol. 1: 29-34, 1987; Hannay, H. J. et al., Anh. Clin. Neuropsychol. 13: 157-250,1998). When comparing both educational models, similarities but also differences are found. According to the Houston Conference model--but not to the former model--neuropsychology represents a specialty of psychology. In the Houston Conference training model, applied knowledge is overtly emphasized, whereas fundamental or basic knowledge in neuropsychology appears weak. The proposed program does not seem to provide sufficient emphasis and background knowledge in (1) History of neuropsychology, (2) Neuropsychological syndromes, and (3) Neuropsychology theory.
最近提出了两种神经心理学培训模式（INS第40分部教育、认证和资格认定特别工作组指南，《临床神经心理学》第1卷：29 - 34页，1987年；汉内，H. J. 等人，《澳大利亚临床神经心理学》第13卷：157 - 250页，1998年）。在比较这两种教育模式时，发现了它们的异同之处。根据休斯顿会议模式——而非之前的模式——神经心理学是心理学的一个专业领域。在休斯顿会议培训模式中，应用知识被明显强调，而神经心理学的基础知识或基础理论显得薄弱。所提议的课程似乎没有对以下方面给予足够的重视和背景知识讲解：（1）神经心理学史，（2）神经心理综合征，以及（3）神经心理学理论。
