Reynolds Cecil R
Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4225, USA.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2002 Sep;12(3):143-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1020395711263.
Ardila (Neuropsychol. Rev. 12: 3, 2002) criticizes the Policy Statement from the Houston Conference on Specialty Education and Training in Clinical Neuropsychology (Hannay et al., Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 13: 157-250, 1998) as possessing deficiencies in the training of clinical neuropsychologists in three fundamental knowledge areas: the history of the discipline, neuropsychological syndromes, and neuropsychological theory. These problems are seen here as a result of a more pervasive problem associated with the Houston Conference training model's emphasis on technical skill over science and the attempt to micromanage the training of the clinical neuropsychologist at the administrative level.
阿迪拉（《神经心理学评论》第12卷：第3期，2002年）批评了休斯顿临床神经心理学专业教育与培训会议的政策声明（汉内等人，《临床神经心理学档案》第13卷：157 - 250页，1998年），认为该声明在临床神经心理学家的三个基础知识领域的培训存在缺陷：该学科的历史、神经心理学综合征和神经心理学理论。这里所看到的这些问题，是由于与休斯顿会议培训模式相关的一个更普遍的问题导致的，该模式强调技术技能而非科学，并且试图在行政层面微观管理临床神经心理学家的培训。
