McGinn Thomas, Seltz Megan, Korenstein Debra
Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York 10029, USA.
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1150-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00019.
To assess the utility and practicality of an evidence-based format in internal medicine attending rounds.
Two randomly selected teams of residents and medical students in the internal medicine program at the Montefiore Medical Center participated in "Evidence-Based Medicine Attending Month." The process entailed the development of patient-based, searchable questions, a search for the evidence, the critical appraisal of the retrieved literature, and the application of the evidence to the care of the patient. At the last meeting, participants evaluated each case by answering three questions about whether the process (1) had changed the medical management of the patient during the admission, (2) had changed the way they would manage similar patients in the future, and (3) had informed them about the disease process in general.
A total of 12 of 16 formal EBM questions were developed and assessed (75% completion rate) during the four-week period, in addition to the standard background literature reviews usually performed. Twenty-two articles were retrieved and critically appraised. The evaluation demonstrated that 50% of the participants felt the process had changed the active management of patients currently treated by the team, 75% reported that the process would affect the care of future patients with comparable medical problems, and over 90% believed the program had informed them about the disease process.
The formal EBM approach was conveniently implemented and enhanced the learning experience of the participants. It helped inform students' and residents' patient care at the time and their attitudes towards future patients. Hence, it is both practical and useful to perform formal EBM attending rounds.
评估循证模式在内科主治医师查房中的实用性和可行性。
蒙特菲奥里医疗中心内科项目中随机挑选的两组住院医师和医学生参与了“循证医学主治医师月”活动。该过程包括提出基于患者的可检索问题、查找证据、对检索到的文献进行批判性评价以及将证据应用于患者护理。在最后一次会议上,参与者通过回答三个问题来评估每个病例,这三个问题分别是该过程是否(1)在患者住院期间改变了医疗管理方式,(2)改变了他们未来处理类似患者的方式,以及(3)让他们对疾病过程有了总体了解。
在四周的时间里,除了通常进行的标准背景文献综述外,共提出并评估了16个正式的循证医学问题中的12个(完成率为75%)。检索并批判性评价了22篇文章。评估表明,50%的参与者认为该过程改变了团队目前治疗患者的积极管理方式,75%的人报告该过程将影响未来患有类似医疗问题患者的护理,超过90%的人认为该项目让他们对疾病过程有了了解。
正式的循证医学方法实施方便,增强了参与者的学习体验。它有助于在当时为学生和住院医师的患者护理提供信息,并影响他们对未来患者的态度。因此,进行正式的循证医学主治医师查房既实用又有用。