New BMJ policy on economic evaluations.
作者信息
Smith Richard
出版信息
BMJ. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1124.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
New BMJ policy on economic evaluations.《英国医学杂志》关于经济评估的新政策。
BMJ. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1124.
2
New BMJ policy on economic evaluations. Will the Lancet play ball?英国医学杂志关于经济评估的新政策。《柳叶刀》会配合吗？
BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):445; author reply 445.
3
New BMJ policy on economic evaluations. Response of NHS Economic Evaluation Database Research Team.英国医学杂志关于经济评估的新政策。英国国家医疗服务体系经济评估数据库研究团队的回应。
BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):445; author reply 445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.445.
4
New BMJ policy on economic evaluations. Economic evaluations are often based on many studies.《英国医学杂志》关于经济评估的新政策。经济评估通常基于多项研究。
BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):445; author reply 445.
5
New BMJ policy on economic evaluations. Will the BMJ return clinical trials if submitted without any economic results?
BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):445; author reply 445.
6
New BMJ policy on economic evaluations. Economic evaluations should be judged on scientific merit.《英国医学杂志》关于经济评估的新政策。经济评估应根据科学价值来评判。
BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):445; author reply 445.
7
Editorial independence at the BMJ:.and the author apologises unreservedly.《英国医学杂志》的编辑独立性：……作者毫无保留地道歉。
BMJ. 2004 Sep 11;329(7466):624-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7466.624-d.
8
BMJ endgames: a new web-based BMJ/JGIM collaboration.《英国医学杂志》终局：《英国医学杂志》与《普通内科杂志》基于网络的新合作。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar;29(3):423-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2758-9.
9
Editorial independence at the BMJ: NEJM editor says facts in letter are wrong and accusations reckless..《英国医学杂志》的编辑独立性：《新英格兰医学杂志》编辑称信中的事实有误且指控轻率。
BMJ. 2004 Sep 11;329(7466):624. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7466.624-b.
10
Trial protocols at the BMJ.《英国医学杂志》的试验方案。
BMJ. 2004 Dec 11;329(7479):1360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1360.
引用本文的文献
1
Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions.在长期病症管理中，初级保健与专科保健之间的衔接处进行共享护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3.
2
Publication patterns of cancer cost-effectiveness studies presented at major conferences.主要会议上发表的癌症成本效益研究的发表模式。
Curr Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(6):319-25. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1438.
3
Can the Spanish care system assume the new costs of medications against cancer?西班牙的医疗保健系统能否承担抗癌药物的新费用？
Clin Transl Oncol. 2008 Feb;10(2):96-101. doi: 10.1007/s12094-008-0163-3.
4
Peer support in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial in primary care with parallel economic and qualitative analyses: pilot study and protocol.2型糖尿病的同伴支持：一项在初级保健中进行的随机对照试验，同时进行平行的经济学和定性分析：试点研究与方案
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jul 31;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-45.
5
Reporting pharmacoeconomic evaluations.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(11):1073. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523110-00001.
6
Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis.与临床试验同时进行的成本效用分析的发表延迟：登记分析
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1536-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38079.502326.AE. Epub 2004 Apr 20.
7
New BMJ policy on economic evaluations. Response of NHS Economic Evaluation Database Research Team.英国医学杂志关于经济评估的新政策。英国国家医疗服务体系经济评估数据库研究团队的回应。
BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):445; author reply 445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.445.
本文引用的文献
1
The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial.多中心动脉瘤筛查研究（MASS）：关于腹主动脉瘤筛查对男性死亡率影响的随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1531-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11522-4.
2
Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial.多中心动脉瘤筛查研究（MASS）：基于随机对照试验四年结果的腹主动脉瘤筛查成本效益分析
BMJ. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1135. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1135.
3
Quality of economic evaluations in health care.
BMJ. 2002 Feb 9;324(7333):313-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7333.313.
4
5
Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years.50年来2000项精神分裂症对照试验的内容与质量。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1181-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1181.
6
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.《英国医学杂志》经济学投稿的作者及同行评审指南。《英国医学杂志》经济评估工作小组。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275-83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275.
7
New horizons in medical ethics. Priorities in medicine.医学伦理学的新视野。医学中的优先事项。
Br Med J. 1973 Jun 16;2(5867):648-53. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5867.648.
Zotero 插件