• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在长期病症管理中,初级保健与专科保健之间的衔接处进行共享护理。

Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions.

作者信息

Smith Susan M, Cousins Gráinne, Clyne Barbara, Allwright Shane, O'Dowd Tom

机构信息

HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI Medical School, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin, Ireland, Dublin 2.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3
PMID:28230899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6473196/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than primary or specialty care alone; however, little is known about the effectiveness of shared care.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of shared care health service interventions designed to improve the management of chronic disease across the primary/specialty care interface. This is an update of a previously published review.Secondary questions include the following:1. Which shared care interventions or portions of shared care interventions are most effective?2. What do the most effective systems have in common?

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library to 12 October 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

One review author performed the initial abstract screen; then two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series analyses (ITS) evaluating the effectiveness of shared care interventions for people with chronic conditions in primary care and community settings. The intervention was compared with usual care in that setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies, evaluated study quality and judged the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We conducted a meta-analysis of results when possible and carried out a narrative synthesis of the remainder of the results. We presented the results in a 'Summary of findings' table, using a tabular format to show effect sizes for all outcome types.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 42 studies of shared care interventions for chronic disease management (N = 18,859), 39 of which were RCTs, two CBAs and one an NRCT. Of these 42 studies, 41 examined complex multi-faceted interventions and lasted from six to 24 months. Overall, our confidence in results regarding the effectiveness of interventions ranged from moderate to high certainty. Results showed probably few or no differences in clinical outcomes overall with a tendency towards improved blood pressure management in the small number of studies on shared care for hypertension, chronic kidney disease and stroke (mean difference (MD) 3.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68 to 5.25)(based on moderate-certainty evidence). Mental health outcomes improved, particularly in response to depression treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.62; six studies, N = 1708) and recovery from depression (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.57 to 4.26; 10 studies, N = 4482) in studies examining the 'stepped care' design of shared care interventions (based on high-certainty evidence). Investigators noted modest effects on mean depression scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.29, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.20; six studies, N = 3250). Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), processes of care and participation and default rates in shared care services were probably limited (based on moderate-certainty evidence). Studies probably showed little or no difference in hospital admissions, service utilisation and patient health behaviours (with evidence of moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that shared care improves depression outcomes and probably has mixed or limited effects on other outcomes. Methodological shortcomings, particularly inadequate length of follow-up, may account in part for these limited effects. Review findings support the growing evidence base for shared care in the management of depression, particularly stepped care models of shared care. Shared care interventions for other conditions should be developed within research settings, with account taken of the complexity of such interventions and awareness of the need to carry out longer studies to test effectiveness and sustainability over time.

摘要

背景

共享照护已被用于多种慢性病的管理,其假设是它能提供比单纯初级照护或专科照护更好的护理;然而,对于共享照护的有效性知之甚少。

目的

确定旨在改善初级/专科照护界面慢性病管理的共享照护健康服务干预措施的有效性。这是对先前发表综述的更新。次要问题包括:1. 哪些共享照护干预措施或共享照护干预措施的哪些部分最有效?2. 最有效的系统有哪些共同之处?

检索方法

我们检索了截至2015年10月12日的MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。

入选标准

由一位综述作者进行初步摘要筛选;然后两位综述作者独立筛选并选择纳入研究。我们纳入了评估共享照护干预措施对初级保健和社区环境中慢性病患者有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照试验(NRCT)、前后对照研究(CBA)和中断时间序列分析(ITS)。将干预措施与该环境中的常规护理进行比较。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立从纳入研究中提取数据,评估研究质量,并使用GRADE方法判断证据的确定性。我们尽可能对结果进行荟萃分析,并对其余结果进行叙述性综合。我们在“结果总结”表中呈现结果,使用表格形式展示所有结局类型的效应量。

主要结果

我们确定了42项关于慢性病管理共享照护干预措施的研究(N = 18,859),其中39项为RCT,2项为CBA,1项为NRCT。在这42项研究中,41项研究考察了复杂的多方面干预措施,持续时间为六个月至24个月。总体而言,我们对干预措施有效性结果的信心从中度到高度确定。结果显示,总体临床结局可能几乎没有差异或没有差异,在少数关于高血压、慢性肾病和中风共享照护的研究中,血压管理有改善趋势(平均差(MD)3.47,95%置信区间(CI)1.68至5.25)(基于中度确定性证据)。心理健康结局有所改善,特别是在针对抑郁症治疗的反应方面(风险比(RR)1.40,95%置信区间(CI)1.22至1.62;六项研究,N = 1708)以及在考察共享照护干预措施“逐步照护”设计的研究中抑郁症的康复情况(RR 2.59,95% CI 1.57至4.26;十项研究,N = 4482)(基于高度确定性证据)。研究人员指出对平均抑郁评分有适度影响(标准化平均差(SMD)-

相似文献

1
Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions.在长期病症管理中,初级保健与专科保健之间的衔接处进行共享护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Effectiveness of shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in chronic disease management.初级保健与专科保健衔接处的共享护理在慢性病管理中的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.非 ICU 住院患者预防谵妄的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub2.
9
Psychological therapies for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD010558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010558.pub2.
10
Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.急性成人病房患者恶化的预防用早期预警系统和快速反应系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):CD005529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005529.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Evaluation of How Indicators of Inequity and Disadvantage Are Measured and Reported in Population Health Evidence Syntheses.人口健康证据综合研究中不平等和劣势指标测量与报告方式的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 29;22(6):851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060851.
2
Telehealth Support From Cardiologists to Primary Care Physicians in Heart Failure Treatment: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study of the Brazilian Heart Insufficiency With Telemedicine Trial.心力衰竭治疗中心脏病专家对初级保健医生的远程医疗支持:巴西心力衰竭远程医疗试验的混合方法可行性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Apr 17;9:e64438. doi: 10.2196/64438.
3
Expanding the role of community hospitals to promote population health in Singapore.扩大社区医院在促进新加坡民众健康方面的作用。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Jan 22;55:101477. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101477. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Conditions and Co-production of Integrated Care for Patients with Multimorbidity.多病共存患者综合护理的条件与联合生产
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Oct 18;24(4):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7648. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
5
How do cultural elements shape speak-up behavior beyond the patient safety context? An interprofessional perspective in an obstetrics and gynecology department.文化元素如何在患者安全背景之外塑造直言不讳的行为?妇产科部门的跨专业视角。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 4;11:1345316. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1345316. eCollection 2024.
6
eHealth Platforms Facilitate Prostate Cancer Shared Care: A Systematic Review.电子健康平台促进前列腺癌共享护理:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;12(17):1768. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171768.
7
Shared care for patients with a left ventricular assist device: a scoping review.左心室辅助装置患者的共同护理:范围综述。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Sep 2;66(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae285.
8
A Qualitative Investigation of Characteristics Impacting Clinical Decision-Making in Integrated Behavioral Health Care.一项定性研究:综合性行为医疗保健中影响临床决策的特征要素。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;51(4):561-587. doi: 10.1007/s11414-024-09891-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
9
Interventions promoting recovery from depression for patients transitioning from outpatient mental health services to primary care: A scoping review.从精神科门诊服务过渡到初级保健的抑郁症患者康复促进干预措施:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0302229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302229. eCollection 2024.
10
Are We Consulting, Sharing Care, or Taking Over? A Conceptual Framework.我们是在提供咨询、共同护理还是接管?一个概念框架。
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Feb 23;5(1):104-115. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0079. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A stepped-wedge evaluation of an initiative to spread the collaborative care model for depression in primary care.一项关于在初级保健中推广抑郁症协作护理模式的倡议的阶梯楔形评估。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Sep;13(5):412-20. doi: 10.1370/afm.1842.
2
Why collaborative care matters for older adults in China.为何协作式照护对中国老年人至关重要。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;2(4):286-7. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00049-8. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Cost-utility of collaborative care for major depressive disorder in primary care in the Netherlands.荷兰初级保健中重度抑郁症协作护理的成本效益
J Psychosom Res. 2015 Oct;79(4):316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
4
A cluster randomized clinical trial of a stepped care intervention for depression in primary care (STEPCARE)--study protocol.一项针对初级保健中抑郁症的阶梯式护理干预的整群随机临床试验(STEPCARE)——研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 7;15:148. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0542-6.
5
An organizational readiness intervention and randomized controlled trial to test strategies for implementing substance use disorder treatment into primary care: SUMMIT study protocol.一项组织准备度干预及随机对照试验,以测试在初级保健中实施物质使用障碍治疗的策略:SUMMIT研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2015 May 8;10:66. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0256-7.
6
Effectiveness of community-based integrated care in frail COPD patients: a randomised controlled trial.基于社区的综合护理对衰弱 COPD 患者的效果:一项随机对照试验。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2015 Apr 9;25:15022. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.22.
7
[Assessment of a distant collaborative program for the treatment of depression in primary care].[一项针对基层医疗中抑郁症治疗的远程协作项目评估]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Sep;142(9):1142-9. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000900008.
8
Depression and multimorbidity in psychiatry and primary care.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;75(11):e1319-20. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14com09504.
9
The effect of integrated health management model on the health of older adults with diabetes in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验中综合健康管理模式对老年糖尿病患者健康状况的影响
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Telemedicine-based collaborative care for posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized clinical trial.基于远程医疗的创伤后应激障碍协同护理:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;72(1):58-67. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1575.