Van Trigt R, Kerstel E R T, Neubert R E M, Meijer H A J, McLean M, Visser G H
Centrum voor IsotopenOnderzoek, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Dec;93(6):2147-54. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01134.2001.
In Japanese quail (Coturnix c. japonica; n = 9), the doubly labeled water (DLW) method ((2)H, (18)O) for estimation of CO(2) production (l/day) was validated. To evaluate its sensitivity to water efflux levels (r(H(2))O(e); g/day) and to assumptions of fractional evaporative water loss (x; dimensionless), animals were repeatedly fed a dry pellet diet (average r(H(2))O(e) of 34.8 g/day) or a wet mash diet (95.8 g/day). We simultaneously compared the novel infrared laser spectrometry (LS) with isotope ratio mass spectrometry. At low r(H(2))O(e), calculated CO(2) production rate exhibited little sensitivity to assumptions concerning x, with the best fit being found at 0.51, and only little error was made employing an x value of 0.25. In contrast, at high r(H(2))O(e), sensitivities were much higher with the best fit at x = 0.32. Conclusions derived from isotope ratio mass spectrometry and LS were similar, proving the usefulness of LS. Within a threefold range of r(H(2))O(e), little error in the DLW method is made when assuming one single x value of 0.25 (recommended by Speakman JR, Doubly Labelled Water. Theory and Practice. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997), indicating its robustness in comparative studies.
在日本鹌鹑(日本鹌鹑指名亚种;n = 9)中,验证了用于估算二氧化碳产生量(升/天)的双标记水(DLW)法((2)H,(18)O)。为了评估其对水流出水平(r(H₂)O(e);克/天)和蒸发水分损失分数(x;无量纲)假设的敏感性,给动物反复喂食干颗粒饲料(平均r(H₂)O(e)为34.8克/天)或湿糊状饲料(95.8克/天)。我们同时将新型红外激光光谱法(LS)与同位素比率质谱法进行了比较。在低r(H₂)O(e)时,计算出的二氧化碳产生率对关于x的假设表现出很小的敏感性,最佳拟合值为0.51,使用x值0.25时产生的误差很小。相比之下,在高r(H₂)O(e)时,敏感性要高得多,最佳拟合值为x = 0.32。同位素比率质谱法和LS得出的结论相似,证明了LS的实用性。在r(H₂)O(e)的三倍范围内,当假设一个单一的x值0.25(由Speakman JR推荐,《双标记水:理论与实践》。伦敦:查普曼与霍尔出版社,1997年)时,DLW法产生的误差很小,表明其在比较研究中的稳健性。