Fung Lena
Department of Physical Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Oct;95(2):367-72. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.2.367.
The purpose of the study was to establish a profile of coaching efficacy with Hong Kong community coaches who differ in knowledge and hours spent in coaching. Coaching efficacy can be described in four dimensions, namely, Motivation, Strategy, Technique, and Character Building. It was hypothesized that coaches who had spent more time coaching and were more knowledgeable about the sport and coaching would score higher on those four dimensions of a Coaching Efficacy Scale. The scale was administered to 252 coaches working with beginning and district-level athletes in a variety of sports. Analysis suggested that their self-reported efficacy on Strategy was least strong. This means that the coaches were not confident in analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of opposing teams, making decisions on the type of game strategy to employ, and maximizing athletes' strength in competitions. Coaches with less coaching experience were also less confident about motivating athletes. This information on coaching efficacy may be useful in deciding content for a program of education for coaching.
该研究的目的是建立一份针对香港社区教练的教练效能概况，这些教练在知识水平和执教时长方面存在差异。教练效能可从四个维度来描述，即动机、策略、技巧和品格塑造。研究假设，在教练领域投入更多时间且对运动项目和执教更为了解的教练，在教练效能量表的这四个维度上得分会更高。该量表被施用于252名与初阶和区级运动员合作开展各类运动项目的教练。分析表明，他们在策略方面自我报告的效能感最弱。这意味着教练们在分析对手球队的优缺点、决定采用何种比赛策略以及在比赛中最大限度发挥运动员优势方面信心不足。执教经验较少的教练在激励运动员方面也缺乏信心。这些关于教练效能的信息可能有助于确定教练培训项目的内容。
