Suppr超能文献

美国外科医师学会创伤验证审查委员会:它真的有作用吗?

American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma Verification Review: does it really make a difference?

作者信息

Ehrlich Peter F, Rockwell Sherry, Kincaid Stephanie, Mucha Peter

机构信息

Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2002 Nov;53(5):811-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200211000-00001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although not directly involved in designation per se, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma verification/consultation program in conjunction with has set the national standards for trauma care. This study analyzes the impact of a recent verification process on an academic health center.

METHODS

Performance improvement data were generated monthly from the hospital trauma registry. Forty-seven clinical indicators were reviewed. Three study periods were defined for comparative purposes: PRE (January, June, October 1997), before verification/consultation; CON (April 1999-October 1999), after reorganization; and VER (November 1999-September 2000), from consultation to verification.

RESULTS

Statistically significant (p < 0.05) quantitative and qualitative changes were observed in numbers (percent) of patients reaching clinical criteria. These included prehospital, emergency department, and hospital-based trauma competencies. Trauma patient evaluation (including radiology) and disposition out of the emergency department (< 120 minutes) improved in each study section (PRE, 21%; CON, 48%; VER, 76%). Enhanced nursing documentation correlated with improved clinical care such as early acquisition of head computed axial tomographic scans in neurologic injured patients (PRE, 66%; CON, 97%; VER, 95%). Intensive care unit length of stay (< 7 days) decreased (PRE, 87%; VER, 97.8%). Other transformations included increase in institutional morale with recognition of trauma excellence within the hospital and resurgence of the trauma research programs (60 institutional review board-approved projects).

CONCLUSION

The ACS verification/consultation program had a positive influence on this developing academic trauma program. Preparation for ACS verification/consultation resulted in significant improvements in patient care, enhancement of institutional pride, and commitment to care of the injured patient.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学会(ACS)创伤委员会的核查/咨询项目虽未直接参与指定工作,但与其他机构共同制定了创伤护理的国家标准。本研究分析了近期核查过程对一家学术医疗中心的影响。

方法

每月从医院创伤登记处生成绩效改进数据。对47项临床指标进行了审查。为进行比较定义了三个研究阶段:PRE(1997年1月、6月、10月),核查/咨询之前;CON(1999年4月 - 1999年10月),重组之后;VER(1999年11月 - 2000年9月),从咨询到核查。

结果

在达到临床标准的患者数量(百分比)方面观察到具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)的定量和定性变化。这些变化包括院前、急诊科和基于医院的创伤能力。每个研究阶段(PRE为21%;CON为48%;VER为76%)创伤患者评估(包括放射学检查)以及从急诊科转出(< 120分钟)的情况均有所改善。强化护理记录与改善临床护理相关,如神经损伤患者早期进行头部计算机断层扫描(PRE为66%;CON为97%;VER为95%)。重症监护病房住院时间(< 7天)缩短(PRE为87%;VER为97.8%)。其他变化包括医院内对创伤卓越表现的认可提升了机构士气,以及创伤研究项目复苏(60个获得机构审查委员会批准的项目)。

结论

ACS核查/咨询项目对这个发展中的学术创伤项目产生了积极影响。为ACS核查/咨询做准备带来了患者护理的显著改善、机构自豪感增强以及对受伤患者护理的投入增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验