Ponson K J, Hoek van Dijke G A, Joosse Pieter, Snijders C J, Agnew Samuel G
Department of Traumatology, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Trauma. 2002 Nov;53(5):907-12; discussion 912-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200211000-00016.
In an earlier study, we introduced a pelvic ring stability criterion for weightbearing stabilization. In a loading test, however, current external fixation systems alone did not meet this criterion. Internal fixation of the dorsal ring can significantly increase stability, but the condition of severely injured patients is often a contraindication for major surgery. The aim of this study is to optimize external pelvic ring fixation without dorsal ring stabilization to allow weightbearing in early mobilization of patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries.
The stiffness of external fixation systems alone and in combination with one or two anterior plates was measured by using a pelvic replica with a type C pelvic ring injury. Endpoints were 15 mm of dislocation or tolerance of 560 N.
Addition of one plate at least doubles stiffness, whereas two-plate fixation results in at least a fourfold stiffer configuration. Frame configurations profit more than single-bar systems, and all but one system resist the weightbearing load after double-plating of the pubic symphysis.
The choice of double-plate fixation of the anterior ring in addition to external fixation results in weightbearing capacity.
在一项早期研究中,我们引入了一种用于负重稳定的骨盆环稳定性标准。然而,在一项加载试验中,仅目前的外固定系统无法满足该标准。背侧环的内固定可显著提高稳定性,但重伤患者的情况往往是大型手术的禁忌证。本研究的目的是优化无背侧环稳定的外骨盆环固定,以便不稳定骨盆环损伤患者在早期活动时能够负重。
使用具有C型骨盆环损伤的骨盆模型测量单独外固定系统以及与一块或两块前侧钢板联合使用时的刚度。终点为15毫米的移位或560牛的耐受度。
添加一块钢板至少使刚度增加一倍,而双钢板固定导致构型刚度至少增加四倍。框架构型比单杆系统受益更多,并且除一个系统外,所有系统在耻骨联合双钢板固定后均能承受负重负荷。
除了外固定之外,选择前环双钢板固定可实现负重能力。