Suppr超能文献

骨盆后环固定的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of posterior pelvic ring fixation.

作者信息

Yinger Kent, Scalise Jason, Olson Steven A, Bay Brian K, Finkemeier Christopher G

机构信息

Santa Monica Group, Santa Monica, California, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Aug;17(7):481-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200308000-00002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine relative stiffness of various methods of posterior pelvic ring internal fixation.

DESIGN

Simulated single leg stance loading of OTA 61-Cl.2, a2 fracture model (unilateral sacroiliac joint disruption and pubic symphysis diastasis).

SETTING

Orthopaedic biomechanic laboratory.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

Pubic symphysis gapping, sacroiliac joint gapping, hemipelvis coronal plane rotation.

METHODS

Nine different posterior pelvic ring fixation methods were tested on each of six hard plastic pelvic models. Pubic symphysis was plated. The pelvic ring was loaded to 1000N.

RESULTS

All data were normalized to values obtained with posterior fixation with a single iliosacral screw. The types of fixation could be grouped into three categories based on relative stiffness of fixation: For sacroiliac joint gapping, group 1-fixation stiffness 0.8 and above (least stiff) includes a single iliosacral screw (conditions A and J), an isolated tension band plate (condition F), and two sacral bars (condition H); group 2-fixation stiffness 0.6 to 0.8 (intermediate stiffness) includes a tension band plate and an iliosacral screw (condition E), one or two sacral bars in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions G and I); group 3-fixation stiffness 0.6 and below (greatest stiffness) includes two anterior sacroiliac plates (condition D), two iliosacral screws (condition B), and two anterior sacroiliac plates and an iliosacral screw (condition C). For sacroiliac joint rotation, group 1-fixation stiffness 0.8 and above includes a single iliosacral screw (conditions A and J), two anterior sacroiliac plates (condition D), a tension band plate in isolation or in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions E and F), and two sacral bars (condition H); group 2-fixation stiffness 0.6 to 0.8 (intermediate level of instability) includes either one or two sacral bars in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions G and I); group 3-fixation stiffness 0.6 and below (stiffest fixation) consists of two iliosacral screws (condition B) and two anterior sacroiliac plates and an iliosacral screw (condition C).

DISCUSSION

Under conditions of maximal instability with similar material properties between specimens, differences in stiffness of posterior pelvic ring fixation can be demonstrated. The choice of which method to use is multifactorial.

摘要

目的

确定骨盆后环内固定各种方法的相对刚度。

设计

模拟OTA 61 - Cl.2、a2骨折模型(单侧骶髂关节脱位和耻骨联合分离)的单腿站立负荷。

设置

骨科生物力学实验室。

观察变量

耻骨联合间隙、骶髂关节间隙、半骨盆冠状面旋转。

方法

在六个硬塑料骨盆模型上分别测试九种不同的骨盆后环固定方法。对耻骨联合进行钢板固定。对骨盆环施加1000N的负荷。

结果

所有数据均归一化为用单根骶髂螺钉进行后固定所获得的值。根据固定的相对刚度,固定类型可分为三类:对于骶髂关节间隙,第1组——固定刚度为0.8及以上(最不坚固),包括单根骶髂螺钉(情况A和J)、单独的张力带钢板(情况F)以及两根骶骨棒(情况H);第2组——固定刚度为0.6至0.8(中等刚度),包括张力带钢板和骶髂螺钉(情况E)、一根或两根骶骨棒与骶髂螺钉联合使用(情况G和I);第3组——固定刚度为0.6及以下(最坚固),包括两块骶髂前板(情况D)、两根骶髂螺钉(情况B)以及两块骶髂前板和一根骶髂螺钉(情况C)。对于骶髂关节旋转,第1组——固定刚度为0.8及以上,包括单根骶髂螺钉(情况A和J)、两块骶髂前板(情况D)、单独或与骶髂螺钉联合使用的张力带钢板(情况E和F)以及两根骶骨棒(情况H);第2组——固定刚度为0.6至0.8(中等不稳定程度),包括一根或两根骶骨棒与骶髂螺钉联合使用(情况G和I);第3组——固定刚度为0.6及以下(最坚固的固定),由两根骶髂螺钉(情况B)以及两块骶髂前板和一根骶髂螺钉(情况C)组成。

讨论

在标本之间材料特性相似的最大不稳定条件下,可以证明骨盆后环固定刚度的差异。使用哪种方法的选择是多因素的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验