Suppr超能文献

何时拔除胸管?一项随机研究及后续前瞻性连续验证。

When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation.

作者信息

Younes Riad N, Gross Jefferson L, Aguiar Samuel, Haddad Fabio J, Deheinzelin Daniel

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital do Câncer AC Camargo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Nov;195(5):658-62. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01332-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Operative procedures on the pleural space are usually managed by chest tube drainage. Timing for removing the tube is empirically established, with wide variation among surgeons. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of establishing a volume of 200 mL/d of uninfected drainage as a threshold for removal of chest tube, as compared with more frequently used volumes of 100 and 150 mL/d.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized study was performed in a single institution. Patients (n = 139) submitting to pleural drainage after surgical procedures were randomized to one of three groups, defined by the planned timing of chest tube removal (depending on the threshold volume per day of pleural fluid drained): G-100 (< or = 100 mL/d, n = 44); G-150 (< or =150 mL/d, n = 58); and G-200 (< or = 200 mL/d, n = 37). Subsequently, another 91 consecutive patients had chest tubes removed when drainage was less than 200 mL/d (G-val, prospective validation group). All patients had similar discharge and 60-day followup. Drainage time, hospital stay, and reaccumulation rate were registered.

RESULTS

Drainage time (median days: 3.5 for G-100, 3 for G-150, 3 for G-200, 3 for G-val) and hospital stay (median days: 4 for G-100, 3 for G-150, 3 for G-200, 3 for G-val) were not statistically different among groups. Radiologic reaccumulation rates were 9.1% for G-100, 13.1% for G-150, 5.4% for G-200, and 10.9% for G-val, and the thoracenteses rates were 2.3%, 0.8%, 2.7%, and 3.3%, respectively, with no major differences among groups (G-100 versus G-150 versus G-200; G-200 versus G-val).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the threshold of daily drainage to 200 mL before removing the chest tube did not markedly affect drainage, hospitalization time, or overall costs, nor did it increase the likelihood of major pleural fluid reaccumulation. This volume (200 mL/d) could be recommended for chest tube withdrawal decision for uninfected pleural fluid with no evidence of air leaks.

摘要

背景

胸膜腔手术操作通常采用胸腔闭式引流管理。拔管时机凭经验确定,不同外科医生差异很大。我们的目的是评估将每日200 mL未感染性引流液量作为胸腔引流管拔除阈值的有效性和安全性,并与更常用的每日100 mL和150 mL的量进行比较。

研究设计

在单一机构进行一项前瞻性随机研究。接受手术后胸腔引流的患者(n = 139)被随机分为三组之一,根据计划的胸腔引流管拔除时间(取决于每日胸腔引流量阈值)定义:G-100(≤100 mL/d,n = 44);G-150(≤150 mL/d,n = 58);和G-200(≤200 mL/d,n = 37)。随后,另外91例连续患者在引流量小于200 mL/d时拔除胸腔引流管(G-val,前瞻性验证组)。所有患者均有相似的出院情况和60天随访。记录引流时间、住院时间和再积聚率。

结果

引流时间(中位数天数:G-100为3.5天,G-150为3天,G-200为3天,G-val为3天)和住院时间(中位数天数:G-100为4天,G-150为3天,G-200为3天,G-val为3天)在各组间无统计学差异。G-100的影像学再积聚率为9.1%,G-150为13.1%,G-200为5.4%,G-val为10.9%,胸腔穿刺率分别为2.3%、0.8%、2.7%和3.3%,各组间无显著差异(G-100与G-150与G-200;G-200与G-val)。

结论

在拔除胸腔引流管前将每日引流阈值提高到200 mL不会显著影响引流、住院时间或总体费用,也不会增加胸腔积液大量再积聚的可能性。对于无漏气证据的未感染性胸腔积液,可推荐该量(200 mL/d)用于胸腔引流管拔除决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验