Pankuweit Sabine, Portig Irene, Maisch Bernhard
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany.
Herz. 2002 Nov;27(7):669-76. doi: 10.1007/s00059-002-2421-4.
Inflammatory processes induced by rival infection are believed to be one of the major pathogenetic mechanisms in inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy. Although the reason for progression to myocardial failure is not fully understood, postulated mechanisms include persistent viral infection alone or in combination with autoimmune processes.
Murine models of myocarditis have provided insight into the mechanisms by which autoimmune responses to cardiac antigens, probably in response to viral infection of the myocardium, arise and cause tissue pathology. Organ-specificity, cross-reactivity between microbial agents and cardiac tissue, and induction of tolerance to self-antigen are issues still at stake. In addition, cytokines mediate activation and effector phase of innate and specific immunity, which are both important in controlling viral infection. The innate immune response not only has an important protective function but also serves to initiate and regulate subsequent specific immune responses. In man, on the one hand specific T cells and antibodies against different cardiac tissue components have been demonstrated in myocardium and sera of patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, and on the other hand viral genome has been identified in endomyocardial biopsies due to the rapid development of new molecular biological techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), southern blot analysis and in-situ hybridization. But it is still a mater of debate whether virus infection itself, the ensuing immune response, or both, contribute to the deterioration of left ventricular function.
Taking these mechanisms into account, screening for viral genome by PCR and detection of inflammatory infiltrates by immunohistochemistry are considered crucial for the establishment of a definite diagnosis thereby allowing for the initiation of specific therapeutic strategies.
竞争性感染引发的炎症过程被认为是炎症性扩张型心肌病的主要发病机制之一。尽管进展为心肌衰竭的原因尚未完全明确,但推测的机制包括单纯持续性病毒感染或与自身免疫过程相结合。
心肌炎的小鼠模型为研究针对心脏抗原的自身免疫反应(可能是对心肌病毒感染的反应)产生并导致组织病理学变化的机制提供了线索。器官特异性、微生物病原体与心脏组织之间的交叉反应性以及对自身抗原耐受性的诱导仍是有待解决的问题。此外,细胞因子介导先天性免疫和特异性免疫的激活及效应阶段,这两者在控制病毒感染中均很重要。先天性免疫反应不仅具有重要的保护功能,还能启动和调节后续的特异性免疫反应。在人类中,一方面,在炎症性心肌病患者的心肌和血清中已证实存在针对不同心脏组织成分的特异性T细胞和抗体;另一方面,由于聚合酶链反应(PCR)、Southern印迹分析和原位杂交等新分子生物学技术的快速发展,在心肌内膜活检中已鉴定出病毒基因组。但病毒感染本身、随之而来的免疫反应或两者是否导致左心室功能恶化仍存在争议。
考虑到这些机制,通过PCR筛查病毒基因组以及通过免疫组织化学检测炎症浸润被认为对于确立明确诊断至关重要,从而能够启动特定的治疗策略。