Rucquoy G, Descy J, Bouckaert A, Appelmans C, Wauty-Dancot M C
Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1975 Sep;75(5):449-791.
We shall limit ourselves to the main topics, leaving the appreciation of the questionnaire to the reader. To evaluate knowledge and opinions on sexuality in young french speaking belgian people, we have questioned : 1210 students at the University of Louvain, 773 in A1 official teaching, 819 in superior free non university teaching and 778 young people being recruted by the belgian army. The following conclusions are global. The mean vocabulary score (rated on 18) in these four samples is 13.22, 14.06, 13.57 and 6.40. This score is in students more than double than the score in young recruted people (and this phenomenon remains even if one includes only boys in higher education). The mean score (13.81) for whole students in higher education type A1 is significantly superior to the one from the University of Louvain. The score observed in official technical teaching A1 is also greater in comparison to free A1. It is also true for free A1 in comparison to the University of Louvain. The words relating to contraception are particularly misknown in the four samples. Regarding the mean score (on 38) on sexual knowledge not related to vocabulary, it is 22.61 at the University of Louvain, 22.53 in free A1 education, 23.72 in official A1 education and 18.535 in young recruted army people. The difference in mean score between official higher education and the University of Louvain is significant ; it is also significant between University of Louvain students and whole students from A1 education (mean : 23.11). There is no significant difference between the score for the University of Louvain and the one for higher free non university education. The mean score in the army, inferior to 50 %, is rather lower than the scores for the other samples, even if limited to boys. Again, questions on contraception are generally misknown. The total score (in %) is 63.98 at the University of Louvain, 64.46 in A1 free education, 67,46 in A1 official education and 44.53 in young army recruted individus. The score is about 20 % lower at the center for recruting and selecting in comparison to the other samples, even if one takes boys only. The difference between the score in A1 official education and A1 free is significant. It is also between total score (65.92) in whole students from A1 technical education and the one at the University of Louvain. It is not significant for the scores in A1 free education versus the University of Louvain. All scores in A1 official education are superior to the one for confessionnal education, even university ; the interpretation of this phenomenon is probably comparable to the influence of the variable "religion". Regarding opinions, we will only indicate that for factors expressing love (tenderness sexuality and mutual esteem) and the possible means of sexual contacts (physical pleasure, a way of expressing love and procreation) : 1...
我们将只关注主要话题，问卷的评价就留给读者了。为了评估比利时法语区年轻人对性的知识和看法，我们调查了：鲁汶大学的1210名学生、773名接受A1官方教学的学生、819名接受高等非大学免费教学的学生以及778名被比利时军队征召的年轻人。以下结论是总体性的。这四个样本的平均词汇得分（满分18分）分别为13.22、14.06、13.57和6.40。这个得分在学生中比在被征召的年轻人中高出一倍多（即使只考虑高等教育中的男生，这种现象依然存在）。A1类高等教育全体学生的平均得分（13.81）显著高于鲁汶大学的学生。官方技术教学A1中的得分也高于免费A1中的得分。免费A1中的得分相比鲁汶大学的得分也是如此。与避孕相关的词汇在这四个样本中尤其不为人所知。关于与词汇无关的性知识的平均得分（满分38分），鲁汶大学为22.61，免费A1教育中为22.53，官方A1教育中为23.72，被征召入伍的年轻人中为18.535。官方高等教育与鲁汶大学之间的平均得分差异显著；鲁汶大学学生与A1教育全体学生（平均得分：23.11）之间的差异也显著。鲁汶大学的得分与高等非大学免费教育的得分之间没有显著差异。军队中的平均得分低于50%，即使只限于男生，也比其他样本的得分低得多。同样，关于避孕的问题普遍不为人所知。总分（百分比）在鲁汶大学为63.98，免费A1教育中为64.46，官方A1教育中为67.46，被征召入伍的年轻人中为44.53。与其他样本相比，征兵选拔中心的得分低约20%，即使只考虑男生。官方A1教育与免费A1教育的得分差异显著。A1技术教育全体学生的总分（65.92）与鲁汶大学的总分之间也存在差异。免费A1教育与鲁汶大学的得分之间不存在显著差异。A1官方教育的所有得分都高于宗教教育（甚至是大学宗教教育）的得分；对这一现象的解释可能与“宗教”变量的影响类似。关于看法，我们只指出，对于表达爱的因素（温柔的性和相互尊重）以及性接触的可能方式（身体愉悦、表达爱的方式和生育）：1...
