Beveridge T, Kalberer F, Nüesch E, Schmidt R
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Jun 13;8(5):371-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00562665.
Various brands of digoxin tablets, and even different batches of one brand, may differ greatly in bioavailability. Digoxin-Sandoz tablets have been compared with Lanoxin manufactured between 1969 and 1972 and after May 1972. Comparisons were also made between and within batches of Digoxin-Sandoz tablets. Three separate cross-over studies were conducted involving a total of 20 volunteers. Digoxin-Sandoz tablets were shown to have a constant bioavailability and to produce plasma concentrations very similar to ""new'' Lanoxin. Storage for 2 years of one batch of Digoxin-Sandoz did not alter the bioavailability. Particle size was shown to influence bioavailability. Care should be exercised when plasma data alone are interpreted as an index of bioavailability. Measures of bioavailability based on plasma data obtained up to 6 h after administration differed from those based on cumulative urinary excretion data (in this study by a factor of about 2), which can lead to the belief that a difference in bioavailability is much greater than is actually the case. Data from cumulative urinary excretion, collected over a sufficiently long period of time, are likely to be the most reliable method for determining the bioavailability of a substance such as digoxin.
不同品牌的地高辛片,甚至同一品牌的不同批次,其生物利用度可能有很大差异。已将山德士地高辛片与1969年至1972年以及1972年5月之后生产的兰迪(Lanoxin)进行了比较。还对山德士地高辛片的不同批次之间以及批次内部进行了比较。进行了三项独立的交叉研究,共有20名志愿者参与。结果表明,山德士地高辛片具有恒定的生物利用度,其产生的血浆浓度与“新”兰迪非常相似。一批山德士地高辛片储存2年并未改变其生物利用度。结果表明,粒径会影响生物利用度。仅根据血浆数据来解释生物利用度指标时应谨慎。给药后6小时内获得的基于血浆数据的生物利用度测量结果与基于累积尿排泄数据的测量结果不同(在本研究中相差约2倍),这可能导致认为生物利用度差异比实际情况大得多。在足够长的时间内收集的累积尿排泄数据,可能是确定地高辛等物质生物利用度的最可靠方法。