Silver S R, Rinsky R A, Cooper S P, Hornung R W, Lai D
Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS R-44, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Am J Ind Med. 2002 Dec;42(6):481-9. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10139.
Choice of follow-up time for an occupational cohort can influence risk estimates. We examined the effects of follow-up time on relative risk estimates for leukemia and multiple myeloma in a cohort of 1,845 rubber hydrochloride workers.
We generated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for yearly follow-ups, beginning each study in 1940 and increasing study end dates from 1950 through 1996. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to explore the effects of follow-up time on the exposure-response relationship.
The SMR for leukemia rose to 13.55 in 1961 and fell nearly monotonically to 2.47 by 1996. Cox modeling suggested interaction between cumulative exposure and time since exposure. A longer time to peak risk was seen for multiple myeloma.
Because summary risk estimates change with follow-up time, exposure limits set using these estimates may not adequately protect workers. Consideration of appropriate follow-up time and use of more complex temporal models are critical to the risk assessment process.
职业队列随访时间的选择会影响风险估计。我们在一个由1845名盐酸橡胶工人组成的队列中,研究了随访时间对白血病和多发性骨髓瘤相对风险估计的影响。
我们对每年的随访生成标准化死亡比(SMR),每项研究从1940年开始,将研究结束日期从1950年逐年延长至1996年。我们使用Cox比例风险模型来探究随访时间对暴露-反应关系的影响。
白血病的SMR在1961年升至13.55,到1996年几乎呈单调下降至2.47。Cox模型表明累积暴露与暴露后时间之间存在交互作用。多发性骨髓瘤达到风险峰值的时间更长。
由于总结风险估计随随访时间而变化,使用这些估计值设定的接触限值可能无法充分保护工人。考虑适当的随访时间并使用更复杂的时间模型对风险评估过程至关重要。