Adalberth Gunnar, Nilsson Kjell G, Kärrholm Johan, Hassander Helen
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Oct;73(5):531-8. doi: 10.1080/000164702321022802.
We studied CMW-1 bone cement with gentamicin in the laboratory and in a randomized clinical study. Palacos bone cement containing gentamicin was used as the control. In the preclinical evaluation, the CMW cement had slightly less mechanical strength. In the clinical study, 51 patients (51 knees) operated on with total knee arthroplasty were studied for 2 years. We used radiostereometric analysis to measure migration of the tibial components, randomized to fixation with either of the two types of cement. The extent and pattern of migration were similar in both groups, and we found no differences in the number, size and extent of radiolucent lines or clinical outcome. No complications occurred. Our findings suggest a need for more studies of CMW-1 bone cement containing gentamicin in a larger cohort of patients.
我们在实验室和一项随机临床研究中对含庆大霉素的CMW-1骨水泥进行了研究。含庆大霉素的Palacos骨水泥用作对照。在临床前评估中,CMW骨水泥的机械强度略低。在临床研究中,对51例行全膝关节置换术的患者(51个膝关节)进行了为期2年的研究。我们使用放射立体测量分析来测量胫骨组件的移位情况,这些患者被随机分为使用两种骨水泥中的一种进行固定。两组的移位程度和模式相似,我们发现两组在透亮线的数量、大小和范围或临床结果方面没有差异。未发生并发症。我们的研究结果表明,需要在更大的患者队列中对含庆大霉素的CMW-1骨水泥进行更多研究。