a Department of Orthopedic Surgery , Aarhus University Hospital ;
b Department of Clinical Medicine , Aarhus University , Denmark.
Acta Orthop. 2019 Jun;90(3):237-242. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1595390. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
Background and purpose - Long-term fixation of cemented femoral stems relies on several factors including cement adhesion and fatigue. Hi-Fatigue is a newer third-generation bone cement with low-viscosity properties at room temperature, good mechanical strength, and stable bone-cement interface in a laboratory testing environment. Palacos bone cement has excellent 10-year survival and is considered gold standard. We compared stem subsidence after fixation with Hi-Fatigue and Palacos bone cements using radiostereometry. Patients and methods - In a patient-blinded randomized controlled trial, 52 patients (30 women) at mean age 76 years (71-87) with osteoarthrosis and no osteoporosis received Hi-Fatigue G or Palacos R + G cement fixation of collarless, polished, double-tapered stems (CPT). Tantalum beads were inserted in the periprosthetic bone. Supine stereoradiographs were obtained postoperatively, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and VAS pain were recorded preoperatively and 1 and 2 years after surgery. Cement working times and properties were registered. Results - At 2 years, mean stem subsidence of 1.12 mm (95% CI 0.96-1.29) for Hi-Fatigue and 1.19 mm (CI 1.03-1.34) for Palacos was similar. Likewise, stem version was comparable between cement groups. Mean OHS and VAS pain were similar between cement groups. Cement working times were similar between cement groups, but the mean curing time was longer for Hi-Fatigue (13.7 min) than for Palacos (11.6 min). Interpretation - We found similar and generally low migration of CPT femoral stems inserted with Hi-Fatigue and Palacos bone cement until 2 years' follow-up, which indicates a good long-term survival of polished taper femoral stems inserted with both cement types.
骨水泥固定的股骨柄长期固定依赖于多种因素,包括水泥黏附性和疲劳性。Hi-Fatigue 是一种新型第三代骨水泥,具有室温下低黏度、良好的机械强度和在实验室测试环境中稳定的骨水泥界面等特点。Palacos 骨水泥具有优异的 10 年生存率,被认为是金标准。我们通过放射立体测量术比较了 Hi-Fatigue 和 Palacos 骨水泥固定后的柄下沉情况。
在一项患者盲法随机对照试验中,52 名(30 名女性)平均年龄 76 岁(71-87 岁)的骨关节炎且无骨质疏松症的患者接受了无领、抛光、双锥形股骨柄(CPT)的 Hi-Fatigue G 或 Palacos R+G 骨水泥固定。在假体周围骨中插入钽珠。术后、术后 3 个月、6 个月、1 年和 2 年拍摄仰卧位立体射线照片。记录牛津髋关节评分(OHS)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛,分别在术前和术后 1 年和 2 年。记录水泥工作时间和特性。
在 2 年时,Hi-Fatigue 组的平均柄下沉量为 1.12mm(95%CI 0.96-1.29),Palacos 组为 1.19mm(CI 1.03-1.34),两组相似。同样,两组的柄倾斜度也相似。两组的 OHS 和 VAS 疼痛评分相似。两组的水泥工作时间相似,但 Hi-Fatigue 的平均固化时间较长(13.7 分钟),而 Palacos 的平均固化时间较短(11.6 分钟)。
我们发现,直到 2 年随访,用 Hi-Fatigue 和 Palacos 骨水泥固定的 CPT 股骨柄的迁移率相似且通常较低,这表明这两种骨水泥固定的抛光锥形股骨柄具有良好的长期生存率。