Crown William H, Finkelstein Stan, Berndt Ernst R, Ling Davina, Poret Amy W, Rush A John, Russell James M
MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge, Mass, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;63(11):963-71. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n1102.
Approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder will experience a recurrent or chronic course of illness for which long-term treatment is recommended. Moreover, at least 20% of patients diagnosed with depression do not respond satisfactorily to several traditional antidepressant medication treatment trials. Very little is known about the health care costs of patients with treatment-resistant depression.
Based on medical claims data (MarketScan Research Database, The MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge, Mass.) from January 1, 1995, to June 30, 2000, a naturalistic, retrospective analysis was conducted to study the characteristics and health care utilization of patients with treatment-resistant depression. All patients having an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), diagnosis code for unipolar or bipolar depression with specified antidepressant dosing and treatment durations were initially selected. Patients were then classified as "treatment resistant" if either they switched from or augmented initial antidepressant medication with other antidepressants at least twice (outpatient treatment-resistant group) or they switched from or augmented their initial antidepressant medication and also had a claim for either a depression-related hospitalization or suicide attempt (hospitalized treatment-resistant group). Those meeting the initial medication and diagnosis selection criteria but not meeting the treatment-resistance criteria constituted the comparison group. Members of the comparison group had comparatively stable antidepressant medication use patterns, consistent with an acceptable response to treatment. Patients were followed for a minimum of 9 months. Resource utilization was calculated from index date to last available claims data point and then annualized.
Treatment-resistant patients were more likely to be diagnosed with bipolar disorder or concurrent substance abuse or anxiety disorders than the comparison group (p <.001). Treatment-resistant patients were at least twice as likely to be hospitalized (general medical and depression related) and had at least 12% more outpatient visits (p <.02). Treatment resistance was also associated with use of 1.4 to 3 times more psychotropic medications (including antidepressants) (p <.001). Patients in the hospitalized treatment-resistant group had over 6 times the mean total medical costs of non-treatment-resistant depressed patients ($42,344 vs. $6512) (p <.001) and their total depression-related costs were 19 times greater than those of patients in the comparison group ($28,001 vs. $1455) (p <.001).
Treatment-resistant depression is costly and associated with extensive use of depression-related and general medical services. These findings underscore the need for early identification and effective long-term maintenance treatment for treatment-resistant depression.
约50%被诊断为重度抑郁症的患者会经历复发或慢性病程,对此推荐进行长期治疗。此外,至少20%被诊断为抑郁症的患者对几种传统抗抑郁药物治疗试验反应不佳。关于难治性抑郁症患者的医疗费用,人们了解甚少。
基于1995年1月1日至2000年6月30日的医疗理赔数据(MarketScan研究数据库,MEDSTAT集团,马萨诸塞州剑桥),进行了一项自然主义的回顾性分析,以研究难治性抑郁症患者的特征和医疗服务利用情况。最初选择所有具有国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)单极或双极抑郁症诊断代码且有特定抗抑郁药物剂量和治疗时长的患者。如果患者至少两次从初始抗抑郁药物转换或联用其他抗抑郁药物(门诊难治性组),或者他们从初始抗抑郁药物转换或联用且有与抑郁症相关的住院或自杀未遂理赔记录(住院难治性组),则将其归类为“难治性”。那些符合初始药物和诊断选择标准但不符合难治性标准的患者构成对照组。对照组成员的抗抑郁药物使用模式相对稳定,与可接受的治疗反应一致。对患者随访至少9个月。从索引日期到最后可用理赔数据点计算资源利用情况,然后进行年化。
与对照组相比,难治性患者更有可能被诊断为双相情感障碍或并发物质滥用或焦虑症(p <.001)。难治性患者住院(包括普通医疗和与抑郁症相关的住院)的可能性至少是对照组的两倍,门诊就诊次数至少多12%(p <.02)。难治性还与使用多1.4至3倍的精神药物(包括抗抑郁药)相关(p <.001)。住院难治性组患者的平均总医疗费用是非难治性抑郁症患者的6倍多(42,344美元对6512美元)(p <.001),他们与抑郁症相关的总费用比对照组患者高19倍(28,001美元对1455美元)(p <.001)。
难治性抑郁症成本高昂,且与大量使用与抑郁症相关的和普通医疗服务有关。这些发现强调了早期识别和有效长期维持治疗难治性抑郁症的必要性。