Makni Héla, O'Loughlin Jennifer L, Tremblay Michèle, Gervais André, Lacroix Chantal, Déry Véronique, Paradis Gilles
Direction de la Santé Publique de Montréal-Centre, Pavillon Lafontaine, 1301 Sherbrooke E, Montréal, Québec H2L 1M3.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Dec;156(12):1263-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.12.1263.
Primary care physicians are potentially important sources of interventions aimed at preventing youth smoking. Yet recent surveys suggest that physician smoking prevention practices are less than optimal.
To document prevention counseling practices and to identify correlates of these activities in a random sample of general practitioners in Montreal, Quebec.
A cross-sectional mail survey.
Of 440 eligible general practitioners (GPs), 337 (77%) completed the questionnaire. General practitioners were more likely to ascertain the smoking status of adolescents (70.9%) than preadolescents (35.7%). Although about half of the GPs offered advice to prevent smoking onset in young adults (48.6%) and adolescents (48.3%), fewer did so for preadolescents (34.4%); only 12.1% advised parents to discuss smoking onset with their children. Correlates of ascertaining smoking status included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.41), lower proportion of walk-in patients (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.31-5.80), awareness of the "stage of behavior change" model (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.18-4.04), and higher self-efficacy (OR, 4.12, 95% CI, 2.00-8.69). Correlates of provision of prevention advice included more hours spent in direct patient care (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.13-3.34), favorable beliefs and attitudes (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.06-2.83), and higher self-efficacy (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 2.25-8.44).
Our results point to the need for renewed efforts to enhance preventive efforts in primary care settings. Intervention programs for GPs should emphasize overcoming unfavorable beliefs and attitudes and low self-efficacy. Future research should evaluate the effect of brief prevention counseling adapted to increasingly busy practices.
基层医疗医生可能是旨在预防青少年吸烟的干预措施的重要来源。然而,最近的调查表明医生的吸烟预防措施并不理想。
记录预防咨询措施,并在魁北克蒙特利尔的全科医生随机样本中确定这些活动的相关因素。
横断面邮寄调查。
在440名符合条件的全科医生(GP)中,337名(77%)完成了问卷。与青春期前儿童(35.7%)相比,全科医生更有可能确定青少年(70.9%)的吸烟状况。虽然约一半的全科医生为预防年轻人(48.6%)和青少年(48.3%)开始吸烟提供建议,但为青春期前儿童提供建议的较少(34.4%);只有12.1%的医生建议家长与孩子讨论开始吸烟的问题。确定吸烟状况的相关因素包括女性(优势比[OR],1.90;95%置信区间[CI],1.07 - 3.41)、非预约患者比例较低(OR,2.73;95%CI,1.31 - 5.80)、对“行为改变阶段”模型的认识(OR,2.17;95%CI,1.18 - 4.04)以及较高的自我效能感(OR,4.12,95%CI,2.00 - 8.69)。提供预防建议的相关因素包括在直接患者护理中花费的时间更多(OR,1.93;95%CI,1.13 - 3.34)、有利的信念和态度(OR,1.73;95%CI,1.06 - 2.83)以及较高的自我效能感(OR,4.32;95%CI,2.25 - 8.44)。
我们的结果表明需要重新努力加强基层医疗环境中的预防工作。针对全科医生的干预项目应强调克服不利的信念和态度以及低自我效能感。未来的研究应评估适应日益繁忙工作的简短预防咨询的效果。