Sung S W, Park J-J, Kim Y T, Kim J H
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Chongno, Seoul, Korea.
Dis Esophagus. 2002;15(3):204-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00251.x.
Prompt diagnosis and effective treatment are important for thoracic esophageal perforations. The decision for proper management is difficult especially when diagnosed late. However, there is an increasing consensus that primary repair provides good results for repair of thoracic esophageal perforations, which are not diagnosed on time. Primary repair for thoracic esophageal perforations was applied in 20 out of 25 consecutive patients. The time interval between perforation and repair was less than 24 h in six patients (group I), and more than 24 h in 14 patients (group II). The remaining five patients underwent esophagectomy with simultaneous or staged reconstruction because of incorrectable underlying esophageal pathology. Group I had much more iatrogenic causes (P < 0.05). Preoperative sepsis occurred only in group II (P=0.05) and was highly associated with Boerhaave syndrome (P=0.001). Regional viable tissue was used to reinforce the sites of primary repair (n=15, 75%). All of the postoperative morbidity (n=9, 45%) including esophageal leaks (n=6, 30%) and operative death (n=1, 5%) occurred in group II. In patients with postoperative leaks, five eventually healed, but one became a fistula that required reoperation. Primary healing with preservation of the native esophagus was achieved in all 19 patients except one operative death. In addition, the increased incidence of leak and morbidity did not lead to an increase in mortality. In the esophagectomy group, there was no mortality, but one minor suture leak. Regardless of the time interval between the injury and the operation, primary repair is recommended for non-malignant, thoracic, esophageal perforations, but not for anastomotic leaks. Reinforcement that may change the nature of a possible leak is also useful. For incorrectable underlying esophageal pathology, esophagectomy with simultaneous or staged reconstruction is indicated.
及时诊断和有效治疗对胸段食管穿孔至关重要。尤其是在诊断较晚时,做出恰当治疗决策很困难。然而,越来越多的人达成共识,即对于未及时诊断的胸段食管穿孔,一期修复能取得良好效果。25例连续患者中有20例行胸段食管穿孔一期修复。6例患者(I组)穿孔至修复的时间间隔小于24小时,14例患者(II组)则超过24小时。其余5例患者因存在无法纠正的潜在食管病变而接受食管切除术并同期或分期重建。I组医源性病因更多(P<0.05)。术前脓毒症仅发生在II组(P=0.05),且与Boerhaave综合征高度相关(P=0.001)。15例(75%)使用局部存活组织加强一期修复部位。所有术后并发症(9例,45%)包括食管漏(6例,30%)和手术死亡(1例,5%)均发生在II组。术后发生漏的患者中,5例最终愈合,但1例形成瘘管,需要再次手术。除1例手术死亡外,其余19例患者均实现了保留原食管的一期愈合。此外,漏和并发症发生率的增加并未导致死亡率上升。在食管切除组,无死亡病例,但有1例轻微缝线漏。无论损伤与手术之间的时间间隔如何,对于非恶性胸段食管穿孔,推荐一期修复,但不包括吻合口漏。可能改变潜在漏性质的加强措施也很有用。对于存在无法纠正的潜在食管病变,应行食管切除术并同期或分期重建。