Suppr超能文献

建立用于效力测定的欧洲药典口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV)第3批国际生物制品标准品的合作研究。

Collaborative study for the establishment of the Ph. Eur. BRP for oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV) Batch 3 for use in the potency assay.

作者信息

Buchheit K H, Daas A, Stalder J

机构信息

EDQM, Council of Europe, B.P. 907, F-67029 Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Pharmeuropa Spec Issue Biol. 2002 Jun;2002(1):67-91.

Abstract

A collaborative study was initiated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM) with the goal to calibrate the trivalent candidate European Pharmacopoeia Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV) Batch 3 against the 1st International Standard (IS) for OPV and to establish the material as a working standard. The material is a commercial trivalent stabilised oral poliomyelitis vaccine, consisting of Sabin strains of live attenuated poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3. The new standard is meant to replace the current European Pharmacopoeia BRP for OPV Batch 2, the stocks of which will soon be depleted. Fourteen laboratories participated in the study. Three samples had to be assayed (1st IS, BRP Batch 2, candidate BRP Batch 3). The potency of each virus type in each preparation had to be estimated by using either common monoclonal anti-polio antibody sera and/or the participant's routinely used antisera for neutralizing two of the three virus types present in the trivalent vaccine. In addition the total virus content had to be determined. From the raw data returned, log10 CCID50/ml values were calculated using the probit method (CCID50 is the dose infecting 50% of the cell cultures). The precision (intra-assay variation), repeatability (intralaboratory variation) and reproducibility (inter-laboratory variation) were assessed as absolute titres and as the adjusted titres (potencies of the test samples calculated relative to the 1st IS). An analysis of variance was performed to determine if there were significant differences between assays using mono- or polyclonal antisera. The precision, determined as the width of the uncorrected confidence limits taken across all assays within laboratories, varied on average from +/- 0.13 to +/- 0.34. The repeatability (uncorrected titres) standard deviation varied from 0.08 to 0.27 and was on average 0.174. The repeatability (corrected titres) standard deviation varied from 0.11 to 0.33 and was on average 0.176. In both cases the repeatability standard deviation was very similar when compared between types, between antisera and between samples. None of these differences were statistically significant. The reproducibility (for the corrected titres) was analysed by calculating the standard deviation of the laboratory means which ranged from 0.10 to 0.21 and was on average 0.151. For the corrected titres there is no significant indication that the antiserum type used for neutralisation affects the potency estimate. The study shows that the candidate BRP Batch 3 is suitable as a reference substance and, based on the current results, 6.99, 6.06, 6.83 and 7.20 log10 CCID50/ml are the potencies assigned for Types 1, 2, 3 and total virus content, respectively. Stability data indicate that the candidate material is stable when stored at -20 degrees C. Nonetheless the stability of the new reference preparation will be closely monitored. The candidate material was adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission at its session in March 2002 as European Pharmacopoeia OPV BRP Batch 3.

摘要

欧洲药品质量理事会(EDQM)发起了一项合作研究,目的是将口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV)第3批三价候选欧洲药典生物参考制剂(BRP)与OPV第1国际标准(IS)进行校准,并将该材料确立为工作标准。该材料是一种商业化的三价稳定口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗,由脊髓灰质炎病毒1型、2型和3型的减毒活疫苗株(Sabin株)组成。新的标准旨在取代现行的欧洲药典OPV第2批BRP,其库存即将耗尽。14个实验室参与了该研究。需要检测三个样品(第1国际标准品、第2批BRP、候选第3批BRP)。每种制剂中每种病毒类型的效价必须通过使用普通的抗脊髓灰质炎单克隆抗体血清和/或参与者常规使用的抗血清来中和三价疫苗中存在的三种病毒类型中的两种来估计。此外,必须确定总病毒含量。根据返回的原始数据,使用概率单位法计算log10 CCID50/ml值(CCID50是感染50%细胞培养物的剂量)。精密度(批内变异)、重复性(实验室内变异)和再现性(实验室间变异)以绝对效价和调整后的效价(相对于第1国际标准品计算的测试样品的效价)进行评估。进行方差分析以确定使用单克隆或多克隆抗血清的检测之间是否存在显著差异。以实验室所有检测中未校正置信限的宽度确定的精密度平均在+/- 0.13至+/- 0.34之间变化。重复性(未校正效价)标准差在0.08至0.27之间变化,平均为0.174。重复性(校正效价)标准差在0.11至0.33之间变化,平均为0.176。在这两种情况下,类型、抗血清和样品之间比较时,重复性标准差非常相似。这些差异均无统计学意义。通过计算实验室均值的标准差来分析再现性(校正效价),其范围为0.10至0.21,平均为0.151。对于校正效价,没有显著迹象表明用于中和的抗血清类型会影响效价估计。该研究表明,候选第3批BRP适合作为参考物质,根据当前结果,分别为1型、2型、3型和总病毒含量指定的效价为6.99、6.06、6.83和7.20 log10 CCID50/ml。稳定性数据表明,候选材料在-20℃储存时是稳定的。尽管如此,新参考制剂的稳定性仍将受到密切监测。候选材料于2002年3月在欧洲药典委员会会议上被采纳为欧洲药典OPV第3批BRP。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验